Hockey pucks. Awesome. I tried something close to that but I think I'm in trouble.
I just did my first build on a Schwinn cruiser where the down tube didn't leave the cranks in a vee, but closer to horizontal, then it curved upward to meet the top, or nut, bar, as it's called. So the frame was way too big for the 48cc Skyhawk that I was trying to install. I solved this by overextending the mounting studs. Somebody just said, there's your first mistake.
I transferred the longer, factory back studs to the front, and bought two new bolts for the back, only about 3/4in longer, 8.8 grade I'm told. Then I made two filler blocks out of something called Trex. It's decking, as in on your back deck, it's two inches thick, and it's made out of hard rubber and soft plastic. You can scratch it with your fingernail. The front block fills in between the engine case and the frame, is about 1- 1/2in thick, and is cut to fit the curve of the tube; the rear block is square, 2in thick, and goes between the case and the metallic, floating factory block that fits to the frame there. This engine runs pretty smooth, smoother than I expected, and mounted like this I can feel very little vibration going down the road.
Until it snaps and falls apart, which is what I am getting from the discussion. It may not, but suddenly it seems like a bad idea to overextend the factory hardware and provide a flex point for the twisting and the vibration.
Short of welding new mounts, which I am not inclined to do on such a cheap ride, is there really any way to fit one of these engines to a frame that doesn't have that pervect vee to work with? So many cruisers are designed that way now. How about wood blocks, anybody have experience with those? Speak up, homey. How about tapping the engine case for larger, case-hardened studs? How about a third attachment point to the nut bar?