Pulled Over in Grant Florida

GoldenMotor.com

decoherence

New Member
Aug 23, 2010
476
2
0
sebring,fl
as stated before riding on a sidewalk is a nono under power. someplaces reserve the right to prevent any bikes on the sidewalk period.

my first incounter with an officer went reall well & put a positive image of the moto bike.
i was travelling on a rural road
an officer saw me & pulled a uturn.
i made sure i was only doing 20mph.
he followed me over a mile.
we went into a neiborhood.
there was an icecream truck with kids stopped.
when aproaching the truck, i pulled the clutch killed the engine & peddled around the truck.
after i was far from the truck & children, i dumped the clutch.
& went 20mph.
he still was following me.
i make a proper hand signal showing i am making a left turn.
he pulls up besides me a rolls down the window to talk.
he was blown away about how i went from peddle to power & back & how i drove like a person should. then sent me on my way.

we live in a small county.
i am pretty sure almost every deputy heard him talk about my bike.

they leave us alone here.
i did run into another motobike guyin my town & they just asked him to ride with traffic instead of against.
 

RB44

New Member
Apr 19, 2012
15
0
0
Pinellas park Floorida
as stated before riding on a sidewalk is a nono under power. someplaces reserve the right to prevent any bikes on the sidewalk period.

my first incounter with an officer went reall well & put a positive image of the moto bike.
i was travelling on a rural road
an officer saw me & pulled a uturn.
i made sure i was only doing 20mph.
he followed me over a mile.
we went into a neiborhood.
there was an icecream truck with kids stopped.
when aproaching the truck, i pulled the clutch killed the engine & peddled around the truck.
after i was far from the truck & children, i dumped the clutch.
& went 20mph.
he still was following me.
i make a proper hand signal showing i am making a left turn.
he pulls up besides me a rolls down the window to talk.
he was blown away about how i went from peddle to power & back & how i drove like a person should. then sent me on my way.

we live in a small county.
i am pretty sure almost every deputy heard him talk about my bike.

they leave us alone here.
i did run into another motobike guyin my town & they just asked him to ride with traffic instead of against.
sounds like you did everything right" i don`t know how much you use your bike but I have used mine every day for the last five yrs, 99.9 percent of the cops i see pay no attention to me, then there is Pinellas park police where I seem to be public enemy number one????? anyway enjoy what you have there!
 

RB44

New Member
Apr 19, 2012
15
0
0
Pinellas park Floorida
Re: Going to court next week" 4/26/12

yup" I was stopped by Pinellas park,Fl police and cited for operating a motor vehicle with no DL and having a motor vehicle on the sidewalk! I was temporarily on the side walk coasting because there was no room in the street and no bike lane to ride in" so I intend to plead not guilty because as I understand it these are NOT classified as Motor vehicles and are NOT required to be registered by the state of Florida. I will let you all know what happens" Otherwise if you do not here back from me It will likely be that I`am in Jail since I have been unemployed for over 2 yrs I cannot pay these fines anyway . Funny I have been riding this every day for the last 5 yrs and had no problems until i got to Pinellas park.
Just keeping you all up to date! I went to the pre trial hearing today and the case was continued until July 31st. The prosecutor new nothing about the case and wanted my lawyer to get in contact with her at a later date? My lawyer will discus it with them in about a couple of weeks, he says it would be ridiculous for the prosecutor to bring this case to trial ! meanwhile I continue to ride daily" but I do carry a copy of that DMV document james provided us with!
 

CroMagnum

Member
Sep 2, 2011
148
1
16
Los Angeles
A Cop was going to make me pedal home today until I showed him my michigan registration! He first told me I was illegan in florida and i wasent a moped (like i dident know that) he then politely said he would recognize my Michigan registration and have a nice day but expect to be pulled over again.

I've been wondering what would happen in this situation. Different states have laws that vary wildly in terms of what vehicles they will and will not register. Your state may not like what you're riding, but at the same time they are bound by law to recognize and accept a valid vehicle registration from another state. I can drive my truck with CA plates all around FL and it's perfectly legal.

Maybe in those finicky states the solution is to register your MB in a "friendlier" state and then either run with the out-of-state plates or try and transfer it to your home state.

Keep in mind that most states have laws about how long you can wait to reregister a vehicle you bring in - something like you must get Florida plates for your out-of-state vehicle in 30 days. (I don't know FL law so I'm just guessing.) In that case the state has to make the choice of either issuing you a local registration or else denying it. And if they deny it they can't penalize you for not registering it.

I think California is a good candidate as a "donor" state - It's a one-time $19 fee, the DMV never inspects or verifies your MB, registration is done completely by mail, and it never expires or requires renewal. This is what a CA MB registration looks like:







The registration does say both "Motorized Bicycle" and "Moped" so I don't know what legal issues that will cause in states that have different laws for the two. The license plate is one of those small ones and can hang under your seat or be attached to a rack. And you don't have to get any regulation-length state-issued VINs - you just use the frame number already stamped on the bike so if any cop ever check it all matches up.

It looks like Michigan is also another MB friendly state. Has anyone ever compiled a list of easy to register states?

So maybe you guys should start making friends with MBers in friendlier states and start getting registered. I think it will be an interesting experiment to see what happens.
 

RonB

New Member
Jan 30, 2011
82
0
0
Largo florida
I've been wondering what would happen in this situation. Different states have laws that vary wildly in terms of what vehicles they will and will not register. Your state may not like what you're riding, but at the same time they are bound by law to recognize and accept a valid vehicle registration from another state. I can drive my truck with CA plates all around FL and it's perfectly legal.

Maybe in those finicky states the solution is to register your MB in a "friendlier" state and then either run with the out-of-state plates or try and transfer it to your home state.

Keep in mind that most states have laws about how long you can wait to reregister a vehicle you bring in - something like you must get Florida plates for your out-of-state vehicle in 30 days. (I don't know FL law so I'm just guessing.) In that case the state has to make the choice of either issuing you a local registration or else denying it. And if they deny it they can't penalize you for not registering it.

I think California is a good candidate as a "donor" state - It's a one-time $19 fee, the DMV never inspects or verifies your MB, registration is done completely by mail, and it never expires or requires renewal. This is what a CA MB registration looks like:







The registration does say both "Motorized Bicycle" and "Moped" so I don't know what legal issues that will cause in states that have different laws for the two. The license plate is one of those small ones and can hang under your seat or be attached to a rack. And you don't have to get any regulation-length state-issued VINs - you just use the frame number already stamped on the bike so if any cop ever check it all matches up.

It looks like Michigan is also another MB friendly state. Has anyone ever compiled a list of easy to register states?

So maybe you guys should start making friends with MBers in friendlier states and start getting registered. I think it will be an interesting experiment to see what happens.
I don`t know exactly what the laws are in other states but In Florida The DMV will NOT register a Motorized bike because the bike itself has NO certificate of origin and does NOT conform to Motor vehicle safety guidelines therefore if a bicycle has been fitted with a motor it still remains a bicycle ! this information can be found on the Florida DMV website. the problem we have is that cops and some judges are to ignorant to look it up themselves, they think just because it has a motor on it it is a motor vehicle! As i stated in my previous post I`am willing to take this as far as a jury trial! I still ride every day, I just keep a copy of the notarized paper from the DMV James posted for us.
 

CroMagnum

Member
Sep 2, 2011
148
1
16
Los Angeles
I don`t know exactly what the laws are in other states but In Florida The DMV will NOT register a Motorized bike because the bike itself has NO certificate of origin and does NOT conform to Motor vehicle safety guidelines therefore if a bicycle has been fitted with a motor it still remains a bicycle ! this information can be found on the Florida DMV website. the problem we have is that cops and some judges are to ignorant to look it up themselves, they think just because it has a motor on it it is a motor vehicle! As i stated in my previous post I`am willing to take this as far as a jury trial! I still ride every day, I just keep a copy of the notarized paper from the DMV James posted for us.

Generally you only need a "certificate of origin" to register a vehicle the very first time. Once it's been registered in another state the DMV just accepts the other registration or title, so that doesn't apply to the situation described by the Original Poster.

The problem with FL law is it appears to be poorly written and incomplete when it comes to MBs, leaving much up to the interpretation of cops and judges. This is something you'll have to fix in the legislature, not the courts.

And this breaks down the FL crowd into two factions -

1. Those who want gas-powered bikes to be defined as bicycles and completely unregulated.

2. Those who want gas-powered bikes to be defined as motor vehicles and are willing to accept some regulation in order to have laws on the books allowing them to legally ride on the street.


Group 1 seems to be populated entirely by multiple DUI offenders who lost their drivers licenses and now want to ride their China Girl powered bikes on the street with no restrictions whatsoever. I think this is a losing strategy destined for failure. When laws get passed you never get less restrictions, always more. Good luck on convincing government wonks that a wheeled vehicle with a gasoline powered motor that can hit 30+ MPH is like a Segway or wheelchair and not a motor vehicle. Besides, no legislator wants to be seen as providing habitual DUI offenders with a loophole to help get them back on the street. And there's no way a judgement in some piss-ant traffic court is going to set a state-wide legal precedent legalizing MBs once and for all.

My advice to the drunks is park the bike and get a bus pass.

Group 2 is trying the "we're like a moped" path - accept a few restrictions, pay a small fee, wear a helmet, and you're now allowed to ride your MB on public roadways and the cops can't say anything about it. This is the winning strategy that has proven itself time and time again in states across the country. This is actually what they did in California and it works very well. Getting registered and adding a battery-powered tail light is a little annoying. But it's worth it watching the cop who pulled you over look at your paperwork and discover that he can't do anything to you. Yup, many cops don't like MBs, but I've got my plate and rear view mirror so feel free to suck wind, officer. Have a nice day.

The biggest problem I see with FL is they have to make up their minds. With two groups pulling in two different directions they end up working against each other. If they were smart they'd distance themselves from unlicensed drunks and try to get the legislature pass laws legalizing MBs under the guise of "See, they're totally unregulated now. You can help regulate these vehicles by voting yes to the Motorized Bicycle Registration Act."

Seriously, lose the drunks and your chances for reasonable laws will be much better.
 
Last edited:

Mike B

New Member
Mar 23, 2011
2,256
7
0
Central CA
Good.

Drunks shouldn't be riding motorbikes.

Or "tweakers" or dopers or anyone that shows behavior uncaring of the safety of others.

These people should take the bus.
 

CroMagnum

Member
Sep 2, 2011
148
1
16
Los Angeles
@CroMagnum, quite a good post above but know that you've throwing light upon one of the dark little secrets of the motorized bicycle world that mostly gets avoided.

It's the elephant in the room no one wants to talk about.

For more than a year I've been reading the Florida Rants about how they're getting picked on by The Man. It turns out these so-called victims are really nothing but repeated drunk drivers who are just trying to play the system so they can drive a motor vehicle with a revoked driver's license. Of course it's never their fault.

These are the same people who like to spew the "right to travel" drivel to justify riding on the street without a license. I half expect them to declare their trailer park a sovereign nation and start issuing their own currency. When you go to court, check to see if there's a gold fringe on the flag... :rolleyes:

It's too bad TeddyB's thread got hijacked by the DUI crowd. It looked like it was going to be an interesting discussion about out-of-state registration in Florida.
 

SpecialX

New Member
May 1, 2012
137
0
0
Florida
I think it's possible to have several classifications....

Electric AND gas powered bikes with a top CAPABLE speed of 20mph equalling bicycles.
(No registration or license needed, but lights, brakes etc needed)

"…..................................................................." speed of 30mph equalling mopeds.
(Registration AND License needed and lights, directionals, mirrors, etc required.)

That way EVERYONE is happy....

I don't see why it should be all that difficult.
 

BarelyAWake

New Member
Jul 21, 2009
7,194
21
0
Maine
...Group 1 seems to be populated entirely by multiple DUI offenders who lost their drivers licenses and now want to ride their China Girl powered bikes on the street with no restrictions whatsoever. I think this is a losing strategy destined for failure. When laws get passed you never get less restrictions, always more...
@CroMagnum, quite a good post above but know that you've throwing light upon one of the dark little secrets of the motorized bicycle world that mostly gets avoided.
It's the elephant in the room no one wants to talk about...
I disagree - I personally think it's absolutely ridiculous to require a license for such a low speed, simple vehicle as a motorized bicycle as defined by most states (and I have never been ticketed, suspended or otherwise penalized for drunkenness) & it's hardly a conspiratorial "dark secret", something "no one wants to talk about" rather it's just futile & pointless, the public passive, the perpetrators are so commonplace and impenitent, even incorrigibly self righteous despite the obvious - that it isn't the license that's an issue, it's the fact they have and continue to show a complete and absolute disregard for responsibility, perpetually endangering themselves as well as others with reckless behavior, intoxicated or otherwise - as this is most often why a license was lost in the first place, obviously it's requirement & subsequent suspension is ineffective.

Requiring or not requiring a license to operate a motorized bicycle is almost beside the point, it's primarily used to facilitate identification (a political trend) - you don't need a license to be penalized for reckless endangerment, you can get an OUI/DUI/DWI on a pedal bicycle, a drunken disorderly just walking down the street intoxicated & boisterous. There's been an increase towards mandating having identification at all times, but this has very little to do with trying to reduce offenses and far more to do with generalized tracking & control of the population - regardless of if there's a motor vehicle involved or not.

The state of Maine requires an operator's license to utilize a motorized bicycle on public roadways and I can assure you this does nothing to reduce the number of repeat offenders or to discourage them from choosing motorized bicycles to try and "cheat" their restriction, the number of shoddy budweiser bikes is constantly on the rise regardless - as are illegal mopeds, scooters as are unregistered, uninsured Ford Escorts for that matter.

I'm both offended and dismayed by the association of drunk drivers with motorized bicycles, furious at the "right to travel drivel to justify riding on the street without a license" would be so demeaned by that reference alone w/o consideration, that due the incompetence/sheer laziness/agenda of our lawmakers & enforcers that I should be required to carry my "papers" with me at all times despite my law abiding nature, the general criminalization of the populace that has done no wrong, but suffer the consequences of those that have.

If one simply manages to ride/act in a safe, mature & respectful fashion requiring or even having identification/licensing is a moot point - being stopped anyway to check ID harassment. If someone is riding/acting recklessly then and only then should they be penalized & if they should so choose to not have identification they can easily be held, their identity confirmed for subsequent repercussions.

...but this simple, appropriate approach that sufficed for years untold won't be permitted, or continue for much longer where it still is. In the above, I'd say "When laws get passed you never get less restrictions, always more..." is far more relevant than "the DUI crowd" as while they're a problem, they are far more an excuse than a cause, their association with motorized bicycles due to their numbers - but that's a symptom of a far larger issue (socioeconomics, ie gasbikes are cheap). An interesting example of this is when I ride one of my gasbikes, there's the assumption that I'm suspended (to the point I want a shirt that says "I'm not a drunk FFS"), yet when I ride my far more costly ebike no one has ever made that association.

I may well be a minority - but their are those of us that choose to ride motorized bicycles, that haven't lost their license yet still think mandated identification excessive.
 
Last edited:

happyvalley

New Member
Jul 24, 2008
784
1
0
upper Pioneer Valley
I personally think it's absolutely ridiculous to require a license for such a low speed, simple vehicle as a motorized bicycle as defined by most states
Is it? Since most states define a motorized bicycle as 50cc and under, take a honest look around at discussions, of displacement and desired top speed, and reflect how universally pertinent those state definitions really are. I'll leave the political innuendos aside but I see the license issue just one tool and little choice left to LEAs to keep substance abuse at bay or at least reduced somewhat from our roadways.

But more deflections aside, the other poster above was pointing out what I think is an overly ignored truth. Out of thousands of threads, hundreds of thousands of posts, I think one will be hard pressed to find more than a handful of mentions that take this issue on. One can be all offended, dismayed and take it as personally as one will, nevertheless it does nothing to negate the fact that a sizable number of folks who put a motor on a bicycle do so because it's the next thought and step after license revocation and think that because it's only a bicycle they should be exempt from the law. Their other viable choice, and a not so untenable one IMO, would be to simply to ride a pedal bike.
 
Last edited:

SpecialX

New Member
May 1, 2012
137
0
0
Florida
Is it? Since most states define a motorized bicycle as 50cc and under, take a honest look around at discussions, of displacement and desired top speed, and reflect how universally pertinent those state definitions really are. I'll leave the political innuendos aside but I see the license issue just one tool and little choice left to LEAs to keep substance abuse at bay or at least reduced somewhat from our roadways.

But more deflections aside, the other poster above was pointing out what I think is an overly ignored truth. Out of thousands of threads, hundreds of thousands of posts, I think one will be hard pressed to find more than a handful of mentions that take this issue on. One can be all offended, dismayed and take it as personally as one will, nevertheless it does nothing to negate the fact that a sizable number of folks who put a motor on a bicycle do so because it's the next thought and step after license revocation and think that because it's only a bicycle they should be exempt from the law. Their other viable choice, and a not so untenable one IMO, would be to simply to ride a pedal bike.
+1

But what are the percentages of each group?

That's really what's missing from the equation..
Since this is a Florida related thread, how many of those who ride gas powered bikes have licenses?
My guess is, The Majority do NOT.

The real issue is though... Not ALL counties/municipalities agree on their legality for usage at all AND/OR if a license is required.

THAT is what's really needed in Florida.. A clear, concise, specific, STATEWIDE answer.
The real only way to get even close to that particular answer, is to get any law enforcement agency to ask for an opinion from the state's Attorney Generals office.

P.S. Unfortunately ONLY law enforcement or judicial court may ask the AGs office for such an "opinion" and not the "everyday man".
 
Last edited:

BarelyAWake

New Member
Jul 21, 2009
7,194
21
0
Maine
Is it? Since most states define a motorized bicycle as 50cc and under, take a honest look around at discussions, of displacement and desired top speed, and reflect how universally pertinent those state definitions really are. I'll leave the political innuendos aside but I see the license issue just one tool and little choice left to LEAs to keep substance abuse at bay or at least reduced somewhat from our roadways.
Is there no potential in enforcement of those state definitions? Can violations of those definitions not be persecuted if the perpetrator isn't required to be licensed? Do you need a driver's license to be fined, incarcerated, a vehicle impounded or all of the above? Vehicular definitions/limitations and substance abuse concerns are two completely different subjects - yet both are prosecutable with or without a license. Would not more stringent enforcement/penalties serve equally well/better than just the requiring an individual to carry a laminated card?

...One can be all offended, dismayed and take it as personally as one will, nevertheless it does nothing to negate the fact that a sizable number of folks who put a motor on a bicycle do so because it's the next thought and step after license revocation and think that because it's only a bicycle they should be exempt from the law. Their other viable choice, and a not so untenable one IMO, would be to simply to ride a pedal bike.
...and what would you suggest to curb this phenomenon? License requirement is obviously ineffective and no deterrent if it's "the next thought and step after license revocation" to resort to a motorized bicycle even in states that require licensing for such - and if a license isn't required, would not an individual with a suspension still remain subject to existing laws and definitions although they would still be permitted to operate? The ongoing, continuing and habitual violation of existing laws are the concern, an increased enforcement of those existing laws more likely to have an effect than the addition of another to be disregarded.

...what I think is an overly ignored truth. Out of thousands of threads, hundreds of thousands of posts, I think one will be hard pressed to find more than a handful of mentions that take this issue on.
...due partially to the fact that such discussion is relevant only to the 'Laws and Legislation' section where we are currently "mentioning" exactly that issue and where other such mentions can easily be found. You may think it an "an overly ignored truth" but the fact remains that this forum is for the general discussion of motorized bicycles, the legality of such but a single aspect, one that is provided for but dependent on the memberbase to populate.

...and again, what would you suggest?
 

happyvalley

New Member
Jul 24, 2008
784
1
0
upper Pioneer Valley
+1

But what are the percentages of each group?

That's really what's missing from the equation..
Since this is a Florida related thread, how many of those who ride gas powered bikes have licenses?
My guess is, The Majority do NOT.

The real issue is though... Not ALL counties/municipalities agree on their legality for usage at all AND/OR if a license is required.

THAT is what's really needed in Florida.. A clear, concise, specific, STATEWIDE answer.
The real only way to get even close to that particular answer, is to get any law enforcement agency to ask for an opinion from the state's Attorney Generals office.

P.S. Unfortunately ONLY law enforcement or judicial court may ask the AGs office for such an "opinion" and not the "everyday man".
You make good points. From what I've read, enforcement has been disparate depending on which part of the state you're in. And while I agree that statewide parity in enforcement would be a sane approach, I just hope that it would fall in your favor and not the opposite. After all, isn't there a dealer in FL advertising for sale what he calls motorized "DUI bikes"?