yep im just sitting waiting until it dies downEverybody is arguing ,is it the hot weather ?
I hope you will re consider Wayne, I enjoy your insites and posts. Give it another go, They move on like ants as soon as the food is gone, Watch, sale OK and left. Would enjoy your thoughts. They go away pretty soon.I enjoyed reading this thread and liked the idea of the tips and tricks for the HF "ENGINE".
It got side tracked a few times with non essential things, but now has turned into another
"Q" invasion. Same ol' c r a p! -- Thanks for spoiling another thread EZM. Now another thread I won't be looking at any more. I'm outta here.
Just remember-- Harbor Freight ENGINE.
NOT XXX DRIVES.
Would you use the same reduction for a Honda 50cc that turns 7.800 rpm's?Hi Dan,
My comments were not to promote our products! And as far as your mis-information comments, are you an engineer? I watched several comment about removing fins from the flywheel to increase RPM & power, so removing the HEAVY clutch from the same crankshaft would not have the same effect?
We had special clutches made to run on the crankshaft of the Honda & HS motors[easy to do if you are a engineer], and discovered during testing, the motor reved much slower, had a lower top end speed, much wider profile, and a lot more vibration.
Hopefully you can increase production of the drive you promote as we are currently sold out of the Q-Matic. We are about a week behind schedule and could use some help supplying drive systems for our fellow motorbikers. What do you recommend, how much, and were can we purchase the drive? PLEASE step up to the plate and offer a solution instead of negative comments about others.
BTW I hold the majority of speed records on the Whizzer motorbike, and I did it by reducing "spinning mass" and clutch speeds.
The title of this post is "HF engine tips & tricks" and I submit the following. The HF motor using the clutch running at 2.62 X 1 [motor turns 2.62 each time the clutch make one revolution] easily takes off from a stop [without pedaling], achieves a higher top speed than most [if not all]current drive systems. Jim Davis increased the primary pulley size and still had plenty of power with the rear mounted Max Torque clutch drive system on the HF motor.
Just another correction! Some of our dealers DO advertize on this and other sites! Pirate Cycles does advertize and are an authorized EZM dealer [did I miss your ad?]
Have fun,
I hear ya GH. They are never done and have to have one in the works. A while back I stoped for a smoke and there was this weed with a huge and odd flower on it. I took a picture and wanted to start a thread about sights, sounds and smells you only get when on a MB. Then I noticed my rear wheel was tacoed and spent 20 mins waiting for a ride and kicking my wheel.I have followed this thread and have enjoyed it. There is a bunch of good friendly incite on this creation. Harbor Freight is just down the street over here. Dan you got me convinced I want to try a 4 smoke. That HF motor has been looking attractive.
I can't figure out what I like more . Building these MB's , planning them or just plain dreaming about them
Riding them too!!! Its that smile that it puts on my face. I know why a dog sticks its head out the window now.
I can smell laundry , food, spring, fall, plants in bloom, sight , sound, 360 degree view a whole bunch of sence's come up. You just can't get that from a car.
Also there is another thrill. It is the gear head thrill. Will this pig fall apart out from under me thrill. Always comes up when I know I driving it too fast.
That creeping nagging feeling when ya just wanna see what it will do!
LOL, that made the snork threadJim is a good man. Made in America well dont know if he was lol.
THANK YOU! What belt do use 1/2 inch B ,or narrower? Also what rpm engagement clutch should one start with? This will be a big help to this old FoxHi curtisfox,
We designed the drive to be adaptable to a wide range of motors. The original prototype was installed on a 4-stroke HS 142 49 CC motor [2000 to 8000 RPM range] and was tested in 2008 at Lewes, DE. Because of design it is easy to alter the ratios needed for the low RPM or high RPM motors. Last year at Lewes, DE., I had the honor of working with Jim, Chris, & Ray using our drive on the HF 79 CC 4-stroke motors. Of the 2 bikes sporting the HF motor different paths were taken concerning drive ratios. I think Jim & Chris used an adjustable drive pulley whereas Ray had a fixed pulley.
By mounting the clutch at the rear of the drive it is easy [and cheap] to change the size of the front pulley to arrive at the desired ratios for different style motors.
On the higher RPM motors we offer primary ratios in 2.6 X 1, 2.7 X 1, and 2.9 X 1 and a 5.6 X 1 secondary ratio. On the slower or narrow RPM motors the primary drive ratio is either 2.06 X 1 or 2.22 X 1. The "tic" speed of the clutch can be dialed in by using optional weights and or springs.
During testing we discovered the HF motor works best with a 12 X 1 ratio, and the HS or Honda 49 CC motors do very well at 15.5 X 1.
HF motor 12 X 1 ratio @ 4500 = 29 MPH
Honda or HS 15.5 X 1 ratio @ 6800 = 34 MPH
Hope this information is helpful.
Have fun,
AWESOME!!!Hi curtisfox,
Max Torque doesn't offer a clutch to operate correctly on the crankshaft of the 49 CC HS or Honda motors. I have made changes to thier design to make them work, however it is difficult. Some time ago, Jim at Max Torque designed a drive for the hi RPM motors, but he reduced the clutch speed to make it work. He used a chain drive from the crankshaft to the clutch and mounted a shaft through the mounting plate for the final output.
The "tic" speed is about 600 RPMs below total engagement. By moving the clutch to the rear it is easily possible to use the same style clutch and alter the primary ratios to fall below the required "tic" speed.
We supply 5 different belt styles to "dial" in the ratios. .375", .4375" .468", .5", and .511".
During testing we found FHP belts [ 3L, 4L, or 5L] stretched too much and we only use industrial or automotive belts.
Max Torque has special springs, and weights to alter the "tic" and engagement speeds, but not enough range to overcome the high idle speeds over 2200 RPMs. As long as you can reduce the clutch speed between 2 X 1 to 3 X 1 you can easily tune in a Max Torque clutch. On lower RPM motors you can put the clutch on the crankshaft, but remember there is far more vibration at higher RPMs, and the motor must spin the weight at higher RPMs.
I think it takes more power to spin the heavy clutch at higher speeds, but a few don't agree.
If you need the actual belt numbers feel free to PM me.
Have fun,