I would be buying a new Morini engine crank for my hybrid ''very often'' with out the use of lock tight. It has it's ''true manufacture's'' intended purpose where I use it.
For the Happy Time motors well those engines are just plain comical to me. lol
Folks that weigh very little and ride are on a different scale than some others. A work truck wears out from a working hard. Stuff does and can rattle loose.
http://www.parktool.com/blog/repair-help/basic-thread-concepts
Quote: Cycling component manufacturers sometimes use an "aerobic", or "dry" thread-locker for their products, such as on brake caliper bolts. This compound acts primarily as thread filler. If the part is removed, the compound tends to break down, so use a liquid thread-locker to supplement.
Loctite® 222- a low strength threadlocker (water bottle cage bolts, etc.)
Loctite® 242- a low strength threadlocker, but stronger than the 222 (good general use threadlocker)
Loctite® 246- a medium strength threadlocker
Loctite® 290- a medium strength thread
locker, with low viscosity wicking properties
Loctite® 266 high strength threadlocker
Loctite® 270 high strength threadlocker
Loctite® RC603 retaining compound (for poor press fits)
Loctite® RC609 retaining compound (for poor press fits)
Loctite® RC680 retaining compound, high strength, large gap ability (for poor press fits)
No nubee will ever know their materials. It is a given... in light of such they need to know what they are doing?? IMHO anyway. Shoot as 2D says mebbe they should steer clear of it all together. As for me I will use it for its proposed intended manner.