I would not dare compare any of those motors to a H.T. China girl in my humble opinion.
There is always a fellow that needs to learn and fix or repair and learn and learn. Go the extra mile and adhere to a better engineering strategy from the ground up that does not even reflect the way the H.T. motor bolts into a bike. etc. I don't like any of there concepts my self. That's just me from my own observation's.
Somebody out there needs it to just be handed to them. The simpler and more universal you make it and it. It is a China Girl again!! Kinda makes me puck in my mouth a little. Ha Ha
Here is how it really works far as I see it.. Find a proven engine then make a bike frame around it. It will run for years and years and years. Start the whole darn thing over from the ground up. Or find a good steel frame in existence and fabricate good mounts.
We are already making a engine from scratch it would be a terrible thing to put it on a cheap Huffy Cranbrook. IMHO
But here is the butt of it. Save your money or pretend you did? band aids up grades repairs etc..Try to go 50 K miles on this said bike? This concept to me cannot be compared to a Volkswagon. Those things with up keep went way more miles than any H.T. will ever ever ever ever go! No matter how that comparison gets drawn up as I perceive it.
The whole thing is a vicious circle..
I love the unefficient rattling tuning fork hum of a after thought or even the stock exhaust pipe.. helping in 'harm'onious symphony for the engine and bike to fall/rattle apart..
This works great! ''in combination with their jug design concept lol''.
I do not like the H.T. clutch it cannot support command of anything above say 4 H.P.
I cannot say in my personal experience hands on that the way the H.T. motor bolts to a generic bike frame ever really truly impressed me. For a variety of reasons..While a well thought out set of custom billet mounts etc are achievable. They always look cute! Some frames fit better than others, yet how is the metallurgy on it? We are back to way too many potential design flaws from where my view point is..Shrug On bikes that normally would not have been ridding more than 50 miles in a life time
We have folks that weigh in at mebbe 130 pounds wet that might beg to differ? The stock plain Ol hella cheap unmodded H.T. IS for them!!
Even then for a few bucks more a 4 stroke kit is a good upgrade and all the reports I have heard a very good! I think it is bad tho when folks go parading on about that two strokes are bad engines in light of a conversation around a very inferior H.T. and a old repeated complaint. Tons of awesome 2 strokes are out there! Too
Gonna put a better engine then go buy one and build the bike frame around it or use a known good frame. Or just buy the cheapest disposable cracker box H.T. you can find and nickle an dime it on a cheap bicycle this is a hobby for most
Me in personal hind sight, experience I like the whole package done right from the start. The dividends in money return comes out to be exponentially far better for a serious rider. I cannot think of anything more cynical than a collection of inferior parts lying around mocking me and a vicious circle role to play around it.