Thank you OTTO!My son is an attorney, and I'll speak to him about this over lunch tomorrow. I'm also talking to him about helping me get some motorized bicycle laws ammended here as well.
Good way (maybe) to get around it Greg. I'm not so lucky on this build. The buyer is the kinda guy that, if you gave him a screw driver he'd probably stick it in his eye.The liability part is why I "helped "build four bikes for friends, since they were present and were working along side me it was their build.
Thank you OTTO!
'S'quze my igorance but what's a motorized bicycle law?
Good way (maybe) to get around it Greg. I'm not so lucky on this build. The buyer is the kinda guy that, if you gave him a screw driver he'd probably stick it in his eye.
The guy drinks (ahem) a bit. Also found out he crashed one bike he bought from someone who put it together. His story is the front forks broke. He's going after the builder for pain/ suffering and the $200,000 doctor bill for peeling his face up, repairing the face bones and putting his face back on.
Your going to build a bike for someone that has already crashed a bike and is suing another builder. On top of that, you know the guy has a drinking problem. Boy, you sure like pain and suffering yourself with that situation.
Good Luck,
Chris
AKA: BigBlue
Thank you OTTO!
'S'quze my igorance but what's a motorized bicycle law?
Good way (maybe) to get around it Greg. I'm not so lucky on this build. The buyer is the kinda guy that, if you gave him a screw driver he'd probably stick it in his eye.
The guy drinks (ahem) a bit. Also found out he crashed one bike he bought from someone who put it together. His story is the front forks broke. He's going after the builder for pain/ suffering and the $200,000 doctor bill for peeling his face up, repairing the face bones and putting his face back on.
In too am interested in the legality of building/selling motorized bicycles to people as an individual.
One way around the liability issue might be to have a contract where the buyer agrees that he owned the bike and he's merely paying you to install the motor kit for him/her. I'm not a lawyer, but that seems like one avenue to go. The statement wouldn't have to be true so long as the buyer agreed to state it's truth via signing the contract. Of course I would make this abundantly clear to whoever I'd be selling to. I'm not interested in screwing people over.
The only way would be to have them sign a contract saying that you're selling it as art and its not intended for actual use. You could build it, and disconnect a few things such as the clutch lever and some wiring to make it "non-operational" and take pictures of it, and if the buyer hooks everything up to make it operational, that goes against your contract and you're not liable. It also automaticaly makes them the end user/manufacturer, since they are the one that actually made it operational.
My son is looking over the form that was linked early in this thread. He did say that first paragraph is still too vague, but a release can be written to protect the builder. It just has to be very specific. Hopefully, I'll have more info soon. He's very busy right now, and will be in El Paso and Houston most of next week.