mechanickid
New Member
i didn't read this whole tread but i've seen then things going in videos. but they we're barely going, top speed of 15 and very little torque
Wait a sec,
I posted, but I didn't post a reason why it wouldn't work. Just a cynical theory about poor R&D practices.
I don't think I should be included in your overly (generously) inclusive "every one who posted" statement. That wouldn't be fair.
Brenton
Oh yeah,
I forgot to mention, Technocyclist, you won part two. The crank and piston in the T/C engine are totally useless!
Tell me what you would like to have as fas as a new product for your bike...Try to think of something a lot of people would want.
Jim
I was thinking about this thread today and realized something about this wheel that cannot possibly work. The specs say it's an auto clutch. But to start it just pedal along then turn the throttle and it goes.
You need a manual clutch for that very much like how a china 2 stroke would start.
Didn't we have a RevoWheel thread a couple or so months ago ? Is this deja vu
all over again ? The WW1 aircraft with their cranks bolted to the fuselage
sounded familiar....Seems when I asked about the little Honda 50 with the motor in the rear wheel someone posted a photo of it.
Clotho,
Nice research job! Interesting stuff...far more interesting than the Revo site.
Can you image what a remake of the German Megola radial would cost today. $$$
The BSA wheel on the other hand shows a design that has real potential for further development.
Jim
It really shouldn't be all that hard to take power off the other side of the clutch. Jim (Creative Engineering) could do it, no sweat. Leave the actuator where it is. Mainly just another clutch cover with bearing and output sprocket.
That would leave the other end of the clutch shaft for the hydraulic pump. For the lowrider shocks/drops.
Yeah, I dream a lot. But I did cut out the technicolor!
Ted