A little semi-on topic rambling;
Over the years I've seen Huffys that had components that just didn't look all that good. Does anyone remember the straight, all plastic brake levers? And those reallly were bad. (But they're easily replaced.) Stuff like that leaves a bad taste in the mouth. I've noticed that there're folks who'll practically shudder with disgust when you mention the name, "Huffy". It seems to me that these few rather crappy components might be blinding them to the fact that the rest of the bike is pretty good.
I have no hard and fast data to prove that Huffy frames are stronger than others in the same price range. But they certainly don't feel weak to me.
And for those who like speed, Huffys tend to be geared 'high'. Though this doesn't apply to the Cranbrook, of course.
Back when I had enough youth for this type of thing, I'd put Huffy front chain rings on my pedal bikes during the summer. They tend to be a bit bigger than others. When I didn't have to deal with slush and snow and mud, then I'd just fly around during the summer. Then I'd go back to lower gearing in the winter. I've still got those Huffy front chainrings.
The bike I'm riding right now is an old Huffy. From the looks of it, it comes from the tail-end of their Dayton, Ohio days. Frame strength simply doesn't worry me. It can take a beating.
My old Cranbrook will soon be cleaned up and re-motored. Maybe my wife will get my current bike and I'll ride the Cranny. Or maybe my wife'll get a brand new 24 inch Cranbrook. I'm kinda leaning toward the new Cranbrook for her.
Earlier in this thread I gave the Cranbrook a pretty good review. But I was careful not to be too enthusiastic.
But I was being over-cautious. The fact is,
these are great bikes!
To anyone who's wondering whether or not to go for it, I say "Yes".