pinching the line off and the engine dying DOES seem like a vac leak, but what is odd is that that would mean the leak is at some point on the boost bottle side and not on the carb side.
now its not like the engine isn't getting air, when I look at the back of the carb with the air cleaner off there is still a good 1/4 opening for air and mixture to pass through.
what is even stranger is that when I cap off the boost bottle I need to run more initial idle adjustment to maintain the same rpm at idle(which is plenty within spec regardless of video sound- its actually a bit low around 1400 to 1500 when I tested it) i have to add more fuel(mix adjustment), and I lose power in the low end and engine vibration is more significant.
all in all, this cannot be attributed to an air leak, there is just no way considering how it responds when the bottle is removed, and what the pinching of the line infers and the adjustments it requires when it is removed. if I had a leak, I would have to lean it out when I removed the leak, not richen it up which is what I have to do if I cap the bottle.
I noticed an increase in mpg as well suggesting that due to the leaner settings I am able to run on accound of the boost bottle catching some of the fuel from reversion.
I personally do not think top engine builds use them because reed valves are far superior and id run that instead if it were a cheaper option - which to me the extreme affordability is the fun in it. to me, add a shift kit cdi expansion chamber and so on boost the price up to were it detracts from the real novelty of the entire item.
does what I am saying make sense? I do a lot of small block carbed stuff and this just doesn't behave like your typical air leak. im not trying to argue, just from the evidence, it suggests otherwise