highlander9
New Member
I've seen a thread where a person had both! What's the point?
One is a CVP or continually variable planetary transmission + allows for pedaling unaffected and independent from the motor drive.
The other is a rear derailleur + allows for pedaling unaffected and independent from the motor drive.
Wouldn't the benefits of having both the shift kit and CVP quickly taper off after the start-off point which requires pedaling? And if you do pedal, you're still using the CVP anyway.
Plus, you'd have to close the throttle when shifting the Nuvinci (likewise w/ the shift kit), but you don't have to worry about all those expensive parts with just a normal rear derailleur....
It also says on Staton, you need a 34t front freewheel to make it work with a NuVinci...
All these things are factually conflicting! I need help!
One is a CVP or continually variable planetary transmission + allows for pedaling unaffected and independent from the motor drive.
The other is a rear derailleur + allows for pedaling unaffected and independent from the motor drive.
Wouldn't the benefits of having both the shift kit and CVP quickly taper off after the start-off point which requires pedaling? And if you do pedal, you're still using the CVP anyway.
Plus, you'd have to close the throttle when shifting the Nuvinci (likewise w/ the shift kit), but you don't have to worry about all those expensive parts with just a normal rear derailleur....
It also says on Staton, you need a 34t front freewheel to make it work with a NuVinci...
All these things are factually conflicting! I need help!