WeenieI love my motored bike, but a 50 mile round trip commute to work is quite enough.
WeenieI love my motored bike, but a 50 mile round trip commute to work is quite enough.
Just kidding. Using a MB for a commute that long takes a good amount of stamina.Weenie
South Carolina now has one of my favorite stretches, north from Seneca, to Pickens, to Daccusville then up toward Tigersville, and all along that Cherokee Foothills Parkway. Plenty of the spandex croud were on the portion about 20 miles north of Greensville.Would appreciate advice from readers in planning routes that afforded the basics in surviving the trip. Is there a way to research the actual dimensions or shoulder size for the safest roads?? Lots of frontage roads west of the Mississippi, but the south is largely narrow secondary routes that you litterally gamble your life on.
I saw that movie. I don't know how accurate the movie was, but in the movie he was riding a 1939 Norton 500cc single.thats a hard core trip!
supposedly "Ernesto Che Guevara" had an MB and did fequent trips indise argentina on it, parcially as it broke down lol...theres a movey called "motorcycle diaries" based in part on a book he made during his MB trips, and a longer trip to venezuela on a motorcycle
Independently wealthy? If you haven't seen the film, "The World's Fastest Indian" go out today and get it. In 1963, New Zealander Burt Monro traveled half way around the world, on a shoestring budget, to set a world speed record at Bonneville Salt Flats. He did that with no sponsorship, on a 1920 Indian Scout that he had purchased new and spent 42 years modifying. And, at the time he set his first land speed record, he was a 67 year old grandfather. After he began to make a name for himself, he started getting offers of corporate sponsorship, all of which he turned down because he wouldn't let anyone else touch his bike.
What I'm talking about doing rather sounds like a walk in the park, compared to what he did.[/QUOTE
Actually, I don't think it would cost much at all. If you take a 2 week vacation from work, you could cover alot of ground. You get about a hundred mpg's on your bike, and if you're adventurious bring your camping supplies and save on motel costs, it could be the cheapest vacation a person could take!
hey i'll lend you a bike, you just might want to switch out the seat before 3000 miles of ridingAt age 62 and 8 months, I'd considering doing the trip.
Since I live in Hawaii, I'd have to buy or borrow a motorized bike in California.
To do this trip unsupported would not be easy but would cost maybe a couple thousand dollars as a guestimate. An unsupported rider could end up stranded somewhere and waiting on parts shipped at Overnight costs and added food and emergency costs. Costs are hidden in any endeavour.
To do it supported it might cost 4-5 thousand as there are cost for food and gas for support people and the rider. So if one van supported a number of people and my guestimates are close a team of 4 or 5 bike riders could use one 2 man crew of van driver / mechanic people and make it closer to 3 thousand dollars per rider. I am thinking of gas, oil, rubber, parts, food, miscellaneous emergency expenses. Any other imagined costs??
I do know that in 1983 or 4 when Jim Elliott's dad spent about$15,000 on a 10 1/2 day crossing for his bicycle riding son, and I was a part of the team for that RAAM crossing. That included a team of 6 support people to assist one rider going all out at the limits of human endurance. Equipment was used up but I only remember 6 to 8 flats and a few broken spokes. Both could have been caused by 150 lbs air pressure in the $60.00 sew up tires. We repaired a few sew ups to keep from having to buy more but did purchase some in the Aspen / Loveland Pass / Denver area.
Be careful to not plan out the adventure from your adventurewiki said:An adventure is an activity that comprises risky, dangerous or uncertain experiences. An adventurer is a person who bases their lifestyle or their fortunes on adventurous acts.
Sponsorship and support vehicles? Tens of thousands of dollars? While this is a fine way to cross-country, indeed there's nothing at all wrong with it - it is quite a far cry from what I've done my whole life...
Wandering North America at my leisure, just to see whats about.
Starting from the young (and possibly quite naive) age of fourteen all the way up to the ripe old age of... thirty-seven? Is that how old I am now? ... Anyway, barring such detours as college and a few silly attempts at such foolishness as a career, I've spent my life on the American roadways with a couple of waterways thrown in for good measure.
Rarely were these adventures planned in any real way. Quite often there was no particular destination beyond "someplace else" and I've even been known to throw a dart at a map to determine a general heading. No time frame, no plan, no backup - this provides a freedom unfettered by goals and expectations.
It's been a source of amazement for me all those that would plan a trip down to the last minute, rationing out time, parceling out a day spent here - a weekend there. How would you possibly know beforehand what you would think of a place? Why would you constrain yourself to a mere moment spent in a new environment?
Even finance is a much worried subject, with budget taking precedence over the experience altogether way too often. I've very rarely left with more than a few hundred dollars or so in my pocket, a couple of times I've left with little to no cash at all. I spend all my concern on prepping whatever transport I'm using at the time, stocking up on parts, food, supplies, whatever I think necessary beforehand - then I cease worrying about it. I can always wash a few dishes if needful and even this has proved an opportunity to meet new people, see another place, and learn new things.
Despite being essentially lost and destitute, the vast majority of my trips lasted months - even years, depends wholly on how you look at it. It just might be I've never stopped. Thousands upon thousands of miles have passed under me as I sought places of interest and people of culture. Sometimes I'd find an enrapturing haven and I'd stay, days turning into weeks or more. Sometimes I'd just disappear into the early morning mist with nary a goodbye.
It all depends on your priorities. Is the destination more important than the trip - or is the travel itself the adventure you're after? I don't think I've ever actually made it to the place I planned on going, yet the places I've found have been so much more intriguing than expected - how would I have chosen beforehand? How could I pick a place unknown to me? It's this discovery that I value above all else.
I've traipsed about by foot, motorcycle, car and boat. I've even done a bit of drifting about by air in a small ultralight airplane. Each method has it's own advantages and limitations, each has it's own charms and curses. All I can say is look at all the people that have cross-countried with nothing but a mere pedal-powered bicycle and a pack on their rack. All the "support" so touted in the aforementioned method entails it's own support as well, an exponential equation of cross dependencies, all draining your resources, all distracting from the point as I see it.
Use these fine fellow adventurers, these other bicyclists as an example of what can be done. You just have an added advantage of not having to pedal if you don't want to. Sell that van and you've sponsored your trip, that "stranding" so feared in the above post just might be the goal after all, you simply can't know till you're there.
Be careful to not plan out the adventure from your adventure