I agree with everyone here in that this has been a great discussion. Thanks to all.
Davideo I love the idea of combining things, and I wish you luck. My reading of the Transport Canada laws are that the total output of 500w falls under the subsection of "one or more electric motors which have, singly or in combination". This means that you can have 25 motors rigged up in various ways regardless of the number of wheels, but the total power output in combination cannot be > 500W. I would love to see 500 single watt motors working together
And Steve, thank you for your words of caution and I get the sense that you are quite set on the legal situation being as you have assessed it. You have mentioned the "motor attached to a bike even if it is inoperable" point already and I am curious where this one comes from. It strikes me as hard to believe that a person would be charged for this, unless of course they were also involved in some other form of ongoing disrespect or unsafe behaviour as we have covered previously. Thanks.
I am still inclined to agree with Davideo's statement that the situation is evolving and I think that this discussion has shed light on the flexible nature of legal interpretation and application in this case. I wonder if you might be feeling dismayed or exhausted from the shifting legal climate and accepted previous statements to be immovable fact. Given the available legal applications, as we have discussed at length here, I respectfully disagree that this matter is closed. The laws are, at best, murky on the subject and there is an inconsistent approach to how these matters have been handled. At least some onus must be placed on the government to clarify the law or communicate about and apply it with greater consistency. And as a nation in which courts are where laws are eventually applied, tested, struck down, or clarified, I don't consider it an act of "poking an angry bear" to make an informed and careful interpretation of the legal mud puddle that we are currently wading through and to be willing to stand up for it in front of a justice.
Even though riding any bicycle on the sidewalk is illegal, it is well known that parents with young children will do it all the time. Sometimes there is not a safer alternative, and slowly pedaling down the sidewalk for 50 meters to avoid endangering pedestrians/drivers/themselves to put a bike on a stretch of road that is not designed for it. And I cannot find any examples of this being punished in any court in Canada, as this would be an application of a law in a way that it was not intended.
So I will continue to ride my bike, with the chain on and off, and with a motor attached, or in my backpack (or perhaps a big 2-stroke necklace to show off my bling?), with the knowledge that there is still debate within the courts themselves about the legality of the matter and with the deep searching I have done I cannot find anything to state that I should be prohibited in Ontario from riding as I do, since not a single record available shows a person being charged in court unless they were operating unsafely. And I, perhaps naively, consider this to be acting reasonably and safely within the laws as they have been intended and not, perhaps pessimistically, "poking the bear".
Thanks again. Peace.