Re: 4 strokes last longer than 2 strokes? That's debatable
I used to think that 4 strokes last longer and were superior to 2 strokes also, but I am reconsidering my opinion for several reasons:
1. "2 strokes rev higher than 4 strokes": false - 4,000 rpm on a 2 stroke is the same as 4,000 rpm on a 4 stroke, the only difference is that one has a power stroke on every stroke and the other every other stroke.
2. 2 strokes use new oil all the time, four strokes are using used oil that may possibly be out of viscosity range as it ages if it is not a quality oil, causing metal to metal contact. Additives can break down. Old oil can form sludge and clog oil passages. And small engines hold very little oil so it gets hot and can have thermal breakdown. The assumption with a 4 stroke is that if there's oil in there, then it has adequate lubrication - not true.
3. 2 stroke oil has come a long way since 30 weight motor oil was first used at high ratios like 16:1 New high quality oils run at 100:1 or leaner. 2 strokes last longer today because of better quality oils and are smokeless at the leaner mixes.
4. 4 strokes have a possibility of oil starvation - if a 2 stroke has fuel, it has lubrication
5. I adjusted the valves on a well known 4 stroke engine brand, and the metal holding the adjusting screws was brittle and snapped off. The engine had to be junked.
6. New 2 strokes are able to meet modern emission standards.
7. Between valve clearance adjustment on a 4 stroke, the engine is operating below optimum for a while until the valves are adjusted again. Many people don't want to mess with adjusting valves which can lead to engine damage.
8. 2 strokes have fewer moving parts to break.
So I'm seriously leaning towards purchasing a 2 stroke for my motorized bike.