they dropped the unsafe vehicle and helmet charge and dropped the driving while under suspension to driving without a licence and they gave me a 160.00 fine
Ask yourself this, why would they drop the chrarges of the helmet? If its because its not a motor vehicle and no motorcycle helmet is required , then how did they get you on driving without a licence if it's not a motor vehicle?
AND
If it is a motor vehicle, they should / could have got you on the helmet also.
it's because you took the deal, if ya didnt take the deal, you could have gotten off on all the charges. Kinda hard to appeal a deal you took but not impossible.
You took the stance of being guilty of driving without a licence when you actually do have a licence, it's just suspended but still valid (unless its expired), if you're self addmittedly guilty of driving without a licence, then your also guilty of driving on a suspended licence. If they knew they could have gotten you on driving while suspended, they never would have offered you a deal.
They had nothing but bluff.
You took the bait big time.
Just figure this, if they had an actual real case, they could have had you on the hook for
(1) Driving while suspended $1,000 - $5,000 plus an additional 6 months suspension
(2) Improper motorcycle helmet $110
(3) Unsafe vehicle fines are on a case by case basis
So they could have gotten you on an additional 6 months drivers licence suspension, plus at leat $1,110.00 but chose to let you go on a $160.00 fine, gee how very nice of them.
the bikes are definately illegal here and dont see any light at the end of the tunnel to make them legal at all somehow
No proof they are illegal, but you are right that they cannot be made legal, unless of course you modify it sooo much that it then actually becomes a bona fide moped (motor-assisted bicycle).
I think you got ripped, because you don't know the legal definitions of the laws you're dealing with. In other words you got railroaded.
Biknut, he did it to himself, he didnt get ripped, he took the deal, it's up to him to know the legaL definitions, he didnt and most here dont
Sooo much info has been posted in these forums about Ontario legislation, and ppl still dont get it
Why the heck do you need a drivers licence to ride a bicycle (or modified bicycle which no longer is a bicycle, nor a motor vehicle) ???
Answer is that you dont need one, no where in the HTA does it say anyone needs a licence to drive a bicycle.
They baited you with a deal, you didnt know what you were doing even though a lot of info has been provided in these boards, and ya bit the hook and they reeled you in.
If ya cant figure that part out, what are you going to do whith a modified electric bicycle? or even your stang?
I gave a lot of good valuable info in my #57 post
http://motorbicycling.com/f17/well-i-got-pulled-over-22021-6.html#post212987
as have others