wheelbender6
Well-Known Member
The article at the link asks a good question.
At the end of World War II, the USA manufacured high tech machines as well as anyone.
The economy was roaring and its citizens were full of optimism.
America still produces top airplanes, warplanes and helicopters.
-So why can't the USA consistently manufacture sportbikes?
The economies and infrastructure of Germany, Italy and Japan were devastated after WWII, yet they export top sportbikes like crazy.
-Like the author of the article, I do recognize Harley as a manufacturer of great motorcycles.
The Britts make some great sportbikes, but they were on the winning side of WWII.
Buell made some great sportbikes during their partnership with Harley, but it didn't last.
-My reason for the USA bringing up the rear in sportbike production goes back beyond WWII.
I hang it on Henry Ford. That is not a criticism of Henry Ford. It is a recognition of what a huge impact he had on the USA.
-Henry Ford made automobiles affordable for the masses. Americans put their Harley's, Curtiss', Flying Merkels, Excelsiors, etc in the barn and drove Fords. The number of motorcycle manufacturers plummeted in the USA.
-That automobile revolution did not happen in Germany, Italy, Japan and England until years later. They kept on riding their motorcycles to get to work and more motorcycle manufacturers survived there.
I'm certainly not the first person to recognize how the rise of the automobile led to the decline of the motorcycle in the USA. I just may be the first to link it with the lack sportbike manufacturing here.
http://www.motorcycle.com/features/whatever-seems-problem.html
At the end of World War II, the USA manufacured high tech machines as well as anyone.
The economy was roaring and its citizens were full of optimism.
America still produces top airplanes, warplanes and helicopters.
-So why can't the USA consistently manufacture sportbikes?
The economies and infrastructure of Germany, Italy and Japan were devastated after WWII, yet they export top sportbikes like crazy.
-Like the author of the article, I do recognize Harley as a manufacturer of great motorcycles.
The Britts make some great sportbikes, but they were on the winning side of WWII.
Buell made some great sportbikes during their partnership with Harley, but it didn't last.
-My reason for the USA bringing up the rear in sportbike production goes back beyond WWII.
I hang it on Henry Ford. That is not a criticism of Henry Ford. It is a recognition of what a huge impact he had on the USA.
-Henry Ford made automobiles affordable for the masses. Americans put their Harley's, Curtiss', Flying Merkels, Excelsiors, etc in the barn and drove Fords. The number of motorcycle manufacturers plummeted in the USA.
-That automobile revolution did not happen in Germany, Italy, Japan and England until years later. They kept on riding their motorcycles to get to work and more motorcycle manufacturers survived there.
I'm certainly not the first person to recognize how the rise of the automobile led to the decline of the motorcycle in the USA. I just may be the first to link it with the lack sportbike manufacturing here.
http://www.motorcycle.com/features/whatever-seems-problem.html
