And what does it mean that bottom end throttle response is better with the NT? Gotta know these things.
The NT carb is sized right for a 50cc motor. That means, at low rpm, if you snap open the throttle, it will still fuel the motor well enough to accelerate smoothly.
OTOH, with a carb that's a little too big, when you try the same thing, it might stumble at low speed, or have flat acceleration until it gets going a little higher rpm. The trade off is, the bigger carb will probably have a little more power in the upper rpm range.
NT carbs were the original carbs. The CNS was only installed with the goal of passing epa rules. If you're a factory trying to sell legal motors that meet epa rules you have little choice, but to use a carb that's too lean running for the motor to run well.
I think secretly they figure most people will end of changing to a NT after they buy a motor that comes with a CNS. Even though that's kind of a crappy solution, it's better than not being able to get a motor at all.
I made one bike for a friend with a SkyHawk 80 that came with a CNS. Out of the box it only went about 10 mph, but it started and idled fine. After a lot of tuning I got it to run about 25 mph.
A year later she brought it back to me for service, and some repairs. The plastic spacer on the intake manifold was broken. I decided to replace her CNS with a NT. A week later she sent me a email saying she got it up to 35 mph, and she felt like it was a new bike lol. I didn't do any tuning to the NT at all, except move the needle to the next to the leanest position.