This I posted on Smokestack, it is what I know to be the probable answer to wet air filter, which I know now not to be oil, but gasoline mist.
Re: Briggs 80202 oil on paper air filter problem
A lot of information maybe not necessary to tell, but it is the intake valve opening too soon which when the piston is still going up it should only be the exhaust valve opened which is the problem, I think. Read on at your own risk, or feel free to skip down to the bottom.
Tilt of these engines allows to 15 degrees I saw on the Briggs site. Maybe newer engines are just the same as the older and 17 degrees won't matter much anyway.
What I am onto now is that it was oil on the paper air filter at one time, but that was fixed by replacing the oil breather that had a stuck spring and was always open.
I for a short while did disconnect the hose from the breather and plugged the hole on the air filter box where it was going to for a short test. The air filter still got wet. This is meaning that it had to be from the intake port going the wrong way, that is out flow at the air filter.
Now that I really have no intention of cutting the bike frame and widening the space to mount engine flat across, I was still looking to find what is still wetting the paper air filter.
Turns out as before I thought it was oil and it was and I figured that with the original air filter being and oil bath type so extra oil mist would not matter as I never knew there was a problem anyway back when using it with the Vacu-jet carburetor that it was meant to run with. No paper air filter to get sopping wet and restrict air flow was my idea.
An oil bath type of filter would be hard to get mounted on my carburetor and I am also set with the gravity feed system on my bike as it is better suited to my design.
So I cut the paper element out of a paper air filter that is used on the air filter box for my carburetor and kept just the side neoprene gasket and a large opening screen that gives it structure.
I bought foam high filtration air filter foam (blue). I bought the special type of oil and cleaner in spray form for the foam filter material. I fitted and high temperature Permatex RTV'ed the foam cut material in place.
I ran the bike and it seemed to run even better than with the paper air filter. I checked to see if oil was still getting on the filter and how much. I felt since even though it was the wrong type of oil to have on the foam air filter material it would not matter much anyway. When it so bad that it needed cleaning I have a whole can of cleaner and no need to keep buying paper filters to throw out.
This was my intended work around. I knew that something like oil was wetting the filter not much at all by the breather hose back to the carburetor box, but the opposite way of flow through the carburetor throat.
Long time waiting to know what it really was. I left the fuel valve on and the ignition switch off. I had the air filter off the throat of the carburetor. I wanted to put my hand over the throat so I could feel if it was not just pulling a vacuum, but also pressure coming out the opposite way.
I could not get a seal on my palm to check. I decided just to pull the recoil starter and look. I saw a spray of gasoline mist shoot out the throat intermittently. This verified that it was no longer oil as before, but gasoline in a mist form.
The venturi effect is just the same inflow or outflow. But why would there be out flow and I thought of the valves.
I had lapped the valves in their seats. When I still did not have the engine running right an low compression a friend had mentioned that the angle of the valve and seat is damaged after too much lapping and re-cutting valve and seat to proper angle would help. Since idling was a problem and I had not much power I had a shop do this.
I would have done all the work myself, but although a valve cutter for $25 was cheap, The seat cutter would be over $500 and I instead had a machine shop do the work. Two engines I had worked on. $10 per valve and $40 later I have engines that should be reassembled.
I did not work on an older 5S, but the 80202 0430 the one in question I did. I also remember the machinist say that he would grind off the same amount of material that in combination is removed from valve and seat to keep the timing the same.
When I pulled the recoil way back then I noticed a puff of air coming out the intake port. My friend that told me about valve cutting and angles that could be lost due to age or over lapping, mentioned something else. In relation to air coming out of the intake he mentioned scavenging that increases power. These engine I don't believe are meant to operate this way. He did say that early opening of the intake and the mass of flow in would over ride exhaust going out. It could not be seen as it is only at operational rpm of the engine.
Now I know that scavenging is not right in this engine, and the bottom of the valve stem is still too long. I think the machinist did not remove enough from the bottom of the valve stem since my prior lapping also removed material and that was not included.
Now I down loaded a pdf file on Briggs Engines and I found the specification for Intake and Exhaust gap between the tappet and the bottom of the valve stem. I'm going the measure it and if it is too small or non-existent, I will remove from the bottom of the valve stem enough to get the valve timing right.
Here is the think for the pdf:
http://www.oldengine.org/members/mur...20Handbook.pdf
Note that it is a picture scan so it is not useful for searching, but looking at the table of contents I found my information in compression; chapter 4, page 41, table 6 (Valve Tappet Clearance).
My engine is a 5 digit B model so 0.007 inch max to 0.005 inch min for intake clearance. Exhaust is 0.009 inch max to 0.007 inch min.
I have not had the time to see what I measure, but I bet I find this is where it all went wrong.
Maybe as when the engine is operating the way it is now the fuel soaks the foam air filter for a micro second and then the fuel is grabbed back with addition fuel added during the piston going downward and I get greater amount of fuel that was intended in the engine. If there is enough air flow then I am getting a better charge and horse power is up?
I think better compression and less fuel, or the right amount is probably the right way to go anyway. No messy wet air filter.
Some good information on valves and maybe some bad information from a friend on them also is what I have experienced.
Well now I think I know to refer back to this pdf file with a wealth of info. Thanks to oldengine.org
Smokestak was down when I was looking, but I know they link one another anyway.
I think I have it licked now, will let you know!