Can't Skyliner70cc hurry up and move to sea level (where I live) to continue his unbiased research?!?!?
It must be very poor form to try to open another thread about boost bottles, and I apologize....yet I'm still typing!
It seems that they tend to NOT increase top-end performance (which I don't care about) but DO help with low-end performance (which I AM interested in). Starting and idle quality are certainly not a priority. I simply want to "broaden the power band". Any improvement under load or RPMs below it's high-rev sweet spot are longed for. I'm considering a 48t vs the current 44t, but don't want to lose top end either.
I was aghast at the plumbing seen with these kits...thread-in nipples?!?! How can they possibly not inhibit air in-flow with that length of pipe thread sticking down into the airstream?!?!? Has anybody done any welding onto these aluminum (I assume) manifolds? Something along the lines of a plumbing sanitary Y fitting welded on, so there is nothing sticking down into the airflow, nor a sharp 90* bend for "boost gas" to try to flow through, but rather a gradual angle for the "pressurized backwave" to go more readily flow into boost bottle than out the air filter?
Aside from quarkdude and Autocycler (no offense please, I already know your stance) does anybody else have positive comments or real world actual measurements of performance? My mental prowess of logical analysis is siding with Bikeguy Joe, but I want more opinions than the 6 or 7 guys that have previously voiced opinions. Specifically regarding sub-sweet-spot-rpm performance.
It must be very poor form to try to open another thread about boost bottles, and I apologize....yet I'm still typing!
It seems that they tend to NOT increase top-end performance (which I don't care about) but DO help with low-end performance (which I AM interested in). Starting and idle quality are certainly not a priority. I simply want to "broaden the power band". Any improvement under load or RPMs below it's high-rev sweet spot are longed for. I'm considering a 48t vs the current 44t, but don't want to lose top end either.
I was aghast at the plumbing seen with these kits...thread-in nipples?!?! How can they possibly not inhibit air in-flow with that length of pipe thread sticking down into the airstream?!?!? Has anybody done any welding onto these aluminum (I assume) manifolds? Something along the lines of a plumbing sanitary Y fitting welded on, so there is nothing sticking down into the airflow, nor a sharp 90* bend for "boost gas" to try to flow through, but rather a gradual angle for the "pressurized backwave" to go more readily flow into boost bottle than out the air filter?
Aside from quarkdude and Autocycler (no offense please, I already know your stance) does anybody else have positive comments or real world actual measurements of performance? My mental prowess of logical analysis is siding with Bikeguy Joe, but I want more opinions than the 6 or 7 guys that have previously voiced opinions. Specifically regarding sub-sweet-spot-rpm performance.