I've some pics previously posted in this thread:
http://motorbicycling.com/f36/very-satisfied-my-first-build-6300.html
Roller on the jackshaft, huh? I'd like to see what you're talking about.
I was thinking about doing a "reduced speed" roller. For example: With a 1" pulley on the motor shaft and a small timing belt driving a 2" pulley on the friction roller shaft, the roller would only be spinning half the motor rpms. Easier on the roller bearings. The roller would need to be twice the normal diameter. So I would use a 2 1/2" roller instead of 1 1/4". This bigger roller should grip the tire better with less wear on the tire and roller (bigger contact area).
Plus, I could tell people that I'm running a 2 1/2" roller and they would think that I am retarded.
http://motorbicycling.com/f36/very-satisfied-my-first-build-6300.html
Roller on the jackshaft, huh? I'd like to see what you're talking about.
I was thinking about doing a "reduced speed" roller. For example: With a 1" pulley on the motor shaft and a small timing belt driving a 2" pulley on the friction roller shaft, the roller would only be spinning half the motor rpms. Easier on the roller bearings. The roller would need to be twice the normal diameter. So I would use a 2 1/2" roller instead of 1 1/4". This bigger roller should grip the tire better with less wear on the tire and roller (bigger contact area).
Plus, I could tell people that I'm running a 2 1/2" roller and they would think that I am retarded.