I agree. It's sad that the idaho code is somewhat vague but until someone is willing to go through the process of getting a ticket or arrested for driving without a valid license and fight their way through the system to make case law we are bound by the conventional interpretation that already exists. Most people would never do that. They would accept what is perceived as the conventional interpretation of the law and be bound by it. I have a cousin who is an Ada county prosecutor, another cousin who is a captain of the Garden City police department, another cousin who is an assistant warden for a state prison, a father who was a Boise city police officer-Canyon County deputy-Chief of Police in Idaho City, lots of friends who work for the state probation and parole board, and our family attorney used to be Idaho's attorney general so you see where I get my interpretations of the law from when I'm not being pulled over by the police.
As for the suspended license issue I totally agree with you on that. I have no tolerance for those who lose their licenses due to a DUI or DWI or those who have total disregard for public safety or total disregard to public and private property such as those who run from the police and what not. Too many innocent people's lives have been destroyed because of such behavior. As for Greedy's issue though I can understand where he is coming from. His is suspended due to non-payment of child support which has nothing to do with public safety and he requires transportation to get to work. He's working hard to find a loophole that gives him transportation without technically violating the law but in order for that loophole to be considered he's going to have to get a ticket/arrested and go to court and take it to the jury box to up end the conventional interpretation of the law regarding the driver's license issue. His problem with that his suspension may bias the jury against him whereas someone who has never had a driver's license thus no history of driving violations may not bias the jury in such a way.
I have a feeling that eventually the legislature is going to revise the statutes regarding mopeds considering that recent attempts have already been made. As gas prices go up and these things become more popular some politician is going to figure out a new source of revenue from licensing fees. Some cash strapped states are already pushing for mandatory bicycle registration. Idaho now has this miraculous $66 million dollar surplus that seemed to appear out of nowhere but that won't stop anyone from looking for ways to generate more revenue.
As for me I just want to ride my moped worry free so I'm making sure I conform to the laws as explained to me by law enforcement. I'm putting the horn, mirrors, and lights on my moped for my own safety and to comply with the FMVSS in hopes that I can get it registered and plated so I can legally travel from state to state.