30 MPH is a good speed for a 49cc engine.gears are 20 tooth pulley to 100 tooth pulley to a 12 tooth sprocket to a 48 tooth rear sprocket and i can only hit 29.2 mph and it kinda sounds like its rev limited but im not sure where can i get a non rev limited cdi
Or mount a bigger engine like 79cc.......that will fix the slow, non climbing 49cc issue30 MPH is a good speed for a 49cc engine.
Your engine is not rev limited, it is power limited.
Max Power is at 6800 RPM, max Torque is at 4500 RPM, it likes to run between the two.
Once you hit ~30 MPH wind resistance is a factor, you need a bit more power to fight it, or you need to get aerodynamic.
A good combination for more power at 6800 is an NGK 7544 (CR7HIX) Iridium, and replacing the box exhaust with a pipe.
For more speed and low end performance it's gears baby, this does 38 MPH even up a slight hill with those 3" tires using gears and those 2 upgrades.
In short, efficiency gives you results, not trying to make the engine spin faster than it's internal parts can take.
True, gears don't 'make' HP, they optimize it via mechanical advantage.I agree gears don't make that much horse power on that motor. If gears were true I could have a 500 hp 49cc
I am fine with what tiny loss a freewheel bearing may cause for the benefit of gears.Not to mention the power robbed from more moving parts.
Shoot man you talkin to me?? You know I"ve tryed those heck of plenty. This is how one makes up their mind. Definitely not for me. I want my stuff to be bulletproof. Upon saying this most assuredly got different ideas. No cooky cutters in my garage ether...I am fine with what tiny loss a freewheel bearing may cause for the benefit of gears.
You will never understand this until you ride a geared MB, once you go gears, you never go back for a reason ;-}
I think that bike is going to need much better brakes than the v-brakes picturedAnd put in a real engine ;-}
gears don't "give" any horse power only the mechanically challenged would make such a claim instead they optimize torque by increasing an spreadingI agree gears don't make that much horse power on that motor. If gears were true I could have a 500 hp 49cc
Not to mention the power robbed from more moving parts.
No replacement for displacement....
Ayup yur preaching to the Quire over heregears don't "give" any horse power only the mechanically challenged would make such a claim instead they optimize torque by increasing an spreading
the torque of the motor.
gears = torque NOT horse power........
Ahh, you can't see the 'ultratron mag brake' back hub and drag chute is all ;-}I think that bike is going to need much better brakes than the v-brakes pictured
But you claim your engine revs to 11,500 rpm . don't you? it says so on your site as well.30 MPH is a good speed for a 49cc engine.
Your engine is not rev limited, it is power limited.
Max Power is at 6800 RPM, max Torque is at 4500 RPM, it likes to run between the two.
Once you hit ~30 MPH wind resistance is a factor, you need a bit more power to fight it, or you need to get aerodynamic.
A good combination for more power at 6800 is an NGK 7544 (CR7HIX) Iridium, and replacing the box exhaust with a pipe.
For more speed and low end performance it's gears baby, this does 38 MPH even up a slight hill with those 3" tires using gears and those 2 upgrades.
In short, efficiency gives you results, not trying to make the engine spin faster than it's internal parts can take.
But you claim your engine revs to 11,500 rpm . don't you? it says so on your site as well.
when I had one of those cheapie speedometers from china it said my bike could do 38 mph , too. but then I got a real bike computer that now shows the bike to only run at best 27 mph , single speed, same bike as you have KCvale, with a 44 tooth final sprocket. the iridium plug has only one advantage being it will last longer and not extra (FREE)power- after all you preach ,power is not free., so a spark plug does not add power, possibly better spark under ideal conditions,by sending more volts through the coil, but not power. the exhaust , well there I agree, you need a better exhaust than the stock one. I cannot believe that the extra drag added( or power leached) by a jackshaft, and a few gears will let this little engine that is rev limited by the way, and not power limited will get any bike doing over 35 without much internal machining. especially going UP a grade.
But none of this has anything to do with the thread itself---"how to tell if your huasheng is rev limited", luckily it was answered before hijacked.
You wish we had the same drive train ;-}but then I got a real bike computer that now shows the bike to only run at best 27 mph , single speed, same bike as you have KCvale, with a 44 tooth final sprocket.
Ya, I tricked myself, I set my new tach to 4-stroke mode which doubles the spark count, but the HS fires on every revolution not just the compression stroke. I set it to 2-stroke and it's dandy.i was more worried about being able to hit 7800 rpms which i do now after adjusting the valves,
I think you have the right idea. Reliability is everything. The Kiss principle.the iridium plug slight bumps the compression since its slightly longer which means slightly more power , and i was more worried about being able to hit 7800 rpms which i do now after adjusting the valves, speed is not a concern for me right now reliability is and getting the stated power out of my motor
Are you saying that you've racked up over 2,000 miles on that bike so far?You wish we had the same drive train ;-}
I have the one and only 10G KCK Long Shaft transfer case shifter in existence.
Ya, I tricked myself, I set my new tach to 4-stroke mode which doubles the spark count, but the HS fires on every revolution not just the compression stroke. I set it to 2-stroke and it's dandy.
What tach are you using?
I got this one for ~$15
It displays total engine hours when the engine is off, RPM's when it's running.
86 hours on the Fito shifter so far and no issues ;-}
Hahah, naw, typo, 8.6 hours ~50 miles, wasn't even built 86 hours ago ;-}Are you saying that you've racked up over 2,000 miles on that bike so far?
You must have built it over 2 years ago at least. I think that tach is tricking you as well as yourself.......?