Yeah I know your not the one with th song-top engine so again sorry about that question in the previous post...my bad brother.
But, I do want to comment on the piston ramping if you dont mind.
I have put several of these 66cc engines together over the last 5 years, not nearly as many as you have or several others on here, but what I have found is that every single time I have ramped the piston a little on the transfers and exhaust side, Iend up with a better running engine, all of my fastest engines have had pistons with a little ramping to get the air fuel mix in a bit quicker and get the exhaust out a bit quicker.
I know there are members who are very knowledgable about these engines who caution against piston ramps, but along with good clean ports the piston ramping has been one of the most noticeable performance improvements I have seen on an6 of my engines.
I do think if the jug itself offer ideal port timing the ramping can be more harmful to lower end performance, but if the jug has really low transfers and the piston lacks a lot opening the exhaust port @ BDC, I think ramps to help open the transfers a little quicker and just more overall @ BDC and doing the same on the exhaust is a big improvement on those low port jugs.
I have some jugs that basically just rack the transfers open when piston is a@BDC, no way that engine can rev much with that set up.
Raising the jug with an extra base gaske5 cqn help this issue but when you do that yourslowing the intake timing down some also.
Y3s piston ramps do affect final compression, but all the compression that is possible is useless if timing is off and you cant get an ideal charge of fuel/air into the combustion chamber.
I think the trick on these poorly designed engines is to find that sweet spot where you get good fuel charge at the right time and then have a good enough compression ratio to take advantage of the mix in combustion.
I dont claim to have to formula and some that due will not share it, but I do know what has worked best for me on my engines and ramping the piston when using a jug that only opens the tranfers about 50% at BDC seems to be a good performance boost for more rpm potential if all else is done right, well tuned carb, good flowing exhaust etc.
The GT5 engine I just got running a couple weeks ago is a prime example, the Fred piston I put in it is allowing it to rev to about 9000rpm running a standard NT carb, slighly modified kit pipe and a Pedal Chopper head that isnt giving me n3arly the compression I can get from a Puch, Fred Head or the Jakes Diamond head I have.
That engine only has about 60-70 miles on it and I've done 42mph with a 41T sprocket.
I do think the jug needs to be milled to its optimal height especially when a ramped piston is being used, which I did on my GT5, I checked the squish to be @ .025 this isnt as tight as it can be but I decided to leave it there since I will likely change the head and Im not sure where it will be then and I didnt want to go to far with it if possible since initially I just wanted to get this engine running to see what the balance of it would be, it just happens to be very good so I'll do some building up from here to find out what I can get it to do.
By the way maniac, the GT5 Im running that Im so impressed with came from rose326a according to what I was told by the member here I got it from, the magneto that went out n it was stamped 2012 so its a ouple year old model but it has a very smooth running crank, every bit as smooth as any of my 40mm stroke dax lowers.