Consumer Product Safety Commission on Electric Assist Bicycles 2003

GoldenMotor.com

DuctTapedGoat

Active Member
Dec 20, 2010
1,179
10
38
38
Nampa Idaho
[Federal Register: February 12, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 29)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 7072-7073]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr12fe03-3]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


16 CFR Part 1512



Requirements for Low-Speed Electric Bicycles


AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.


ACTION: Final rule.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SUMMARY: Public Law 107-319, 116 Stat. 2776 (the Act), enacted December
4, 2002, subjects low-speed electric bicycles to the Commission's
existing regulations at 16 CFR part 1512 and 16 CFR 1500.18(a)(12) for
bicycles that are solely human powered. For purposes of this
requirement, the Act defines a low-speed electric bicycle as ``a two-or
three-wheeled vehicle with fully operable pedals and an electric motor
of less than 750 watts (1 h.p.), whose maximum speed on a paved level
surface, when powered solely by such a motor while ridden by an
operator who weighs 170 pounds, is less than 20 mph.'' Public Law No.
107-319, section 1, 116 Stat. 2776 (2002). The Commission is issuing
this immediately effective amendment to its requirements for bicycles
at 16 CFR part 1512 to promptly inform the public of the newly enacted
statutory requirement on low-speed electric bicycles.


DATES: This amendment is effective upon publication in the Federal
Register, that is, on February 12, 2003.


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lowell Martin, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC
20207; telephone (301) 504-7628; e-mail [email protected].


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public Law 107-319 (the Act), enacted
December 4, 2002, amends the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA), 15
U.S.C. 2051, et seq., by adding a new


[[Page 7073]]


section 38 establishing requirements for low speed electric bicycles.
Specifically, section 1 of the Act makes low-speed electric
bicycles subject to the Commission's existing regulations on bicycles.


(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, low-speed
electric bicycles are consumer products within the meaning of
section 3(a)(1)[of the CPSA] and shall be subject to the Commission
regulations published at Sec. 1500.18(a)(12) and part 1512 of title
16, Code of Federal Regulations.


Public Law 107-319, section 1, 116 Stat. 2776.
The Act defines the term ``low-speed electric bicycle'' as follows:


(b) for purposes of this section, the term ``low-speed electric
bicycle'' means a two- or three-wheeled vehicle with fully operable
pedals and an electric motor of less than 750 watts (1 h.p.), whose
maximum speed on a paved level surface, when powered solely by such
a motor while ridden by an operator who weighs 170 pounds, is less
than 20 mph.


Id.
The Commission's regulation at 16 CFR 1500.18(a)(12) makes the
determination that bicycles that do not comply with the requirements of
16 CFR part 1512 present a mechanical hazard within the meaning of
section 2(s) of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA). 15 U.S.C.
1261(s). The effect of this determination is that noncomplying bicycles
are ``hazardous substances'' for purposes of section 2(f)(1)(D) of the
FHSA, and are also ``banned hazardous substances'' pursuant to section
2(q)(1)(A) of the FHSA. 15 U.S.C. 1261(f)(1)(D), 1261(q)(1)(A). See
also, Forester v. Consumer Product Safety Com'n, 559 F.2d 774, 783-786
(D.C. Cir. 1977).
The amendment to Sec. 1512.2 of 16 CFR part 1512 promulgated today
incorporates the Act's definition of ``low-speed electric bicycle,''
thereby helping to inform the public of the statutory application of
part 1512 to low-speed electric bicycles.
Section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
authorizes an agency to dispense with certain notice procedures for a
rule when it finds ``good cause'' to do so. 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
Specifically, under section 553(b)(3)(B), the requirement for notice
and an opportunity to comment does not apply when the agency, for good
cause, finds that those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest.'' The requirement reflected in this
amendment is imposed by the Act and is not discretionary with the
Commission. Accordingly, the Commission hereby finds that notice and an
opportunity for comment on this amendment are unnecessary.
Section 553(d)(3) of the APA authorizes an agency, ``for good cause
found and published with the rule,'' to dispense with the otherwise
applicable requirement that a rule be published in the Federal Register
at least 30 days before its effective date. The Commission hereby finds
that the 30 day delay in effective date is unnecessary because the
requirement reflected in the amendment was imposed by the Act and is
not discretionary with the Commission.
Because this amendment incorporates a requirement mandated by
statute that is not discretionary with the Commission, and thus is not
subject to notice and comment, this rule is not subject to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. Because this
amendment incorporates a statutory requirement not subject to agency
discretion, it is not an agency action subject to the National
Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.
Pursuant to Executive Order No. 12988, the Commission states the
preemptive effect of this regulation as follows. Section 1 of the Act
provides that its requirements ``shall supercede any State law or
requirement with respect to low-speed electric bicycles to the extent
that such State law or requirement is more stringent than the Federal
law or requirements referred to in subsection (a)[the Commission's
regulations on bicycles at 16 CFR part 1512].'' Public Law No. 107-319,
section 1, 116 Stat. 2776.


List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 1512


Consumer protection, Hazardous substances, Imports, Infants and
children, Labeling, Law enforcement, and Toys.


For the foregoing reasons, the Commission amends Title 16 of the
Code of Federal Regulation to read as follows:


PART 1512--REQUIREMENTS FOR BICYCLES


1. The authority citation for Part 1512 is revised to read as
follows:


Authority: Secs. 2(f)(1)(D), (q)(1)(A), (s), 3(e)(1), 74 Stat.
372, 374, 375, as amended, 80 Stat. 1304-05, 83 Stat. 187-89 (15
U.S.C. 1261, 1262); Pub. L. 107-319, 116 Stat. 2776.




Sec. 1512.2. [Amended]


2. Amend Sec. 1512.2, to revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
(a) Bicycle means:
(1) A two-wheeled vehicle having a rear drive wheel that is solely
human-powered;
(2) A two- or three-wheeled vehicle with fully operable pedals and
an electric motor of less than 750 watts (1 h.p.), whose maximum speed
on a paved level surface, when powered solely by such a motor while
ridden by an operator who weighs 170 pounds, is less than 20 mph.


Dated: February 6, 2003.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 03-3423 Filed 2-11-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
 

Thud

New Member
May 26, 2010
205
0
0
West Michigan
This is old news DTG,

I have had a few guys try & tell me i cant ride a 4hp e-bike cause it VIOLATES fed. law....I tell them to check their facts.

The law is writen in the "Consumers Protection Act". It only applies to indaviduals or corperations that build power asisted bicycles for sale to the general public, for profit. it adresses E-bicycles specificly as "toys" that children have access to, alredy had a precidence on power levels.

A person/indavidual can build any bicycle (which is classified as a "toy" in federal guidelines) & as long as it is operated in compliance with federal or local ordinaces. If it is home built for personal use, it does not fall into the scope of this legislation.

States have the right to impose any rules "in addition" to the federal guidlines...this is where the water is ultra muddie.

Many states have guidleins of "minimum equipment requirments" for bicycles. Some instantly re-clasiffy a bicycle with an engine mounted to it as a moped (michigan for example) & the machine is then measured to the motor Vehicle code for licencing.

Adding to the confusion is indavidual law enforcment officers. They are all regular guy's like everyone else.(I have a lot of friends in law enforcment) some look the other way on stupid laws & some are sticklers to the letter of the law (what we call Dicks!)....& being human....a lot of the beat cops have no idea what the laws are in these blury debates.

There are all kinds of nuances & leagal crud we with motoerd bieks are on the fringe of...mostly under the radar cause we put the motors on as "kits" for personal use...

In Michigan, putting an engine on my bicycle auto-majicly turns it into a moped. (this is more stringent than fed law) If I put a SBP shift kit on it...it suddenly becomes a "motorcycle" (shifting mopeds are verboden here). The key thng to keep in mind is...Its only ileagal if you get cought...most cops have something more important to do than harass cycleists...unless they are answering a complaint. Then be ready to experiance the civil justic system in all its glory.

Curoius of the intent of the posting? FYI?
 

DuctTapedGoat

Active Member
Dec 20, 2010
1,179
10
38
38
Nampa Idaho
This is old news DTG,

I have had a few guys try & tell me i cant ride a 4hp e-bike cause it VIOLATES fed. law....I tell them to check their facts.

The law is writen in the "Consumers Protection Act". It only applies to indaviduals or corperations that build power asisted bicycles for sale to the general public, for profit. it adresses E-bicycles specificly as "toys" that children have access to, alredy had a precidence on power levels.

A person/indavidual can build any bicycle (which is classified as a "toy" in federal guidelines) & as long as it is operated in compliance with federal or local ordinaces. If it is home built for personal use, it does not fall into the scope of this legislation.

States have the right to impose any rules "in addition" to the federal guidlines...this is where the water is ultra muddie.

Many states have guidleins of "minimum equipment requirments" for bicycles. Some instantly re-clasiffy a bicycle with an engine mounted to it as a moped (michigan for example) & the machine is then measured to the motor Vehicle code for licencing.

Adding to the confusion is indavidual law enforcment officers. They are all regular guy's like everyone else.(I have a lot of friends in law enforcment) some look the other way on stupid laws & some are sticklers to the letter of the law (what we call Dicks!)....& being human....a lot of the beat cops have no idea what the laws are in these blury debates.

There are all kinds of nuances & leagal crud we with motoerd bieks are on the fringe of...mostly under the radar cause we put the motors on as "kits" for personal use...

In Michigan, putting an engine on my bicycle auto-majicly turns it into a moped. (this is more stringent than fed law) If I put a SBP shift kit on it...it suddenly becomes a "motorcycle" (shifting mopeds are verboden here). The key thng to keep in mind is...Its only ileagal if you get cought...most cops have something more important to do than harass cycleists...unless they are answering a complaint. Then be ready to experiance the civil justic system in all its glory.

Curoius of the intent of the posting? FYI?
Just as a quick reference to this.

If you ever see a 20MPH limit and low speed electric bicycle, it's a state that conforms to the Federal standard - it doesn't effect gas bikes.

Plus there's a fellow all up and excited about it on both the forums saying no DL in FL etc etc. So, I figure I'll post this in a nice little corner where it won't get flamed and people can have access to it and not be intimidated by a gigantamous thread.


And that vvv this vvv needs investigation or clarification or something.

Pursuant to Executive Order No. 12988, the Commission states the
preemptive effect of this regulation as follows. Section 1 of the Act
provides that its requirements ``shall supercede any State law or
requirement with respect to low-speed electric bicycles to the extent
that such State law or requirement is more stringent than the Federal
law or requirements referred to in subsection (a)[the Commission's
regulations on bicycles at 16 CFR part 1512].'' Public Law No. 107-319,
section 1, 116 Stat. 2776.
 

Thud

New Member
May 26, 2010
205
0
0
West Michigan
Thanks for the clarification.

I think we are on the same page.
If you ever see a 20MPH limit and low speed electric bicycle, it's a state that conforms to the Federal standard - it doesn't effect gas bikes.
Gas Bike are left out of this because of language specific to the equipment standards for imported motor vehicles of that class, else where in the thesoris that is the consumers protection act.

Just to be clear, that standard is for sellers & manufactures....Its why you don't see assembled "gasoline powerd" Bicycles at Toys R us. The very nature of the machine puts it into a different class of regulations. There is a whole level of politics in selling "vehicles" to the public that require licensing, collecting state tax & belonging to a sales association (cartel).

if anyone is "busted" for going too fast...they won't be ticketed under this code...it will be for riding an unlicenced moped on public streets & a whole list of codes set by whatever state they happen to reside.
(i supose the local DA could go after the seller of the bike if it was deliverd in a condition to allow it break the stated prameters)

Toys (bicycles) are not classified as "vehicles". Put a motor on a bicycle...you blurr the line...but so far, its personal liberty in action that is letting some get away with it....get cought crossing the 20mph barrier in Touscon & you will get your bike impounded...in Mi. local police will let you go(unless some one is complaining) State troopers look for a moped tag. (actualy easy to get here) & 30mph is our speed limit. They don't care if its gas or ellectic. Far fewer ellectrics get noticed. (mine allways do :()

we can't split lanes or blow through stop signs either...I have seen the local bike shops "riding team" all pulled over & ticketed for ignoring a stop sign in a state park. I thought it was funny till I had to pay a $20 jay walking fine!

the point is, if anyone has any worries, they should drop by the local dougnut shop, buy the boys in blue a round of coffee & start a conversation about what the real issue is in their area regarding their toy.....at the very least he will then have an officers name to drop if a "situation" ever arises.

As far as the "Federal Law" its all bunk designed to keep moped dealers happy & protect their market share. Remeber when Pep Boys started selling pocket bikes & chinese scooters? the motorcycle dealers & auto dealers associations teamed up & put a ton of pressure on them to quit (around here they did)

Whoops, long post about nothing. sorry
Have fun.
Thud
 

happyvalley

New Member
Jul 24, 2008
784
1
0
upper Pioneer Valley
Gas Bike are left out of this because of language specific to the equipment standards for imported motor vehicles of that class, else where in the thesoris that is the consumers protection act.

Just to be clear, that standard is for sellers & manufactures....Its why you don't see assembled "gasoline powerd" Bicycles at Toys R us. The very nature of the machine puts it into a different class of regulations.

Whoops, long post about nothing. sorry
Have fun.
Thud
Long post perhaps but you make a valid point, CPSC definitions are irrelevant and outside the purview of homemade kit bikes. The CPSC oversees end user safety on sale and manufacture and defers to individual state DOTs for usage legislation. The endless loop of bureaucratic irony is that state DOTs defer to the federal DOT which is mute on the subject of gasoline powered bicycles.
 

SANGESF

New Member
Feb 23, 2009
641
0
0
Lake Worth
DuctTape is talking about me...

He just posts links with no real point...
Just reference points for people to use for their own personal information.

I already explained to him that the HR727 "law" had nothing to do with the legal status of electric bikes for each state.

He lives in Idaho but has been posting things like this in Florida discussions..

I THINK he's looking to ride an electric bicycle in Idaho, without a license.
Idaho law requires you to have a license because they categorize electric bikes as mopeds.
 
Last edited:

DuctTapedGoat

Active Member
Dec 20, 2010
1,179
10
38
38
Nampa Idaho
No, I wasn't talking about you, I was in fact, talking about occchopperfl.

Well - if you'd like to know, simply ask. Don't assume anything about me.


Many states have modeled their own individual states laws, and municipal laws to reflect that of federal law. The definition of "Bicycle" is one of those things that state's laws show when they are modeled after federal definitions and regulations.


No matter where it's from, some states model their laws after this. You can't refute that.