"MotorNewsBoy"

GoldenMotor.com

tyrslider

New Member
Sep 26, 2008
958
2
0
RainCity
I would call this more "BoardTrack Inspired" (maybe "MotorNewsBoy") as the owner prefers it to have a more upright riding position.

The frame is a Worksman recovered from a barn it shared w/ a 900 lb Hog. I suspect he was drawn to the bike w/ "itching post" eyes 'cause the wheels were folded over in addition to other, more superficial, "hog damage". In fact that's when I realised that Worksman wheels (at least mine) are not laced up properly (<<<, and not <<>). Hmm... kinda reads like "Airplane" under Over, over Under, vector Victor; you get the idea.

Forks from Raleigh upgraded w/ a Fox Vanilla damper 'n' spring w/ 1 1/8" headset and steerer. Spring might be stiff but we'll give it a try 1st. Lifan 98cc 2.5 HP FlatHead motor. Doin' a 6 speed shifter transmitted in front and Below the motor. Has a rear drum brake; haven't decided for the front but we have options. IRC Metro tires to keep the rubber side down! Wide crank spindle is going to be a must

Been takin' some lessons from this site and others; we're gonna do a simple in frame gas tank 'tween the top tubes.

The plumbers seat tube is a nice touch but it's gotta go!

I'll have it mocked up and running soon I hope. then a quick strip down and off to powdercoat matte on flat or flat on matte don't know haven't decided.

The motor mount is finished and I'm making bearing carriers for the jackshaft that'll mount up on the front underside of the motor mount for rigidity and alignment ease.

I don't have any need to bypass the governer other than it doesn't lend itself to throttle/cable control; I 'm not looking to make the motor spin faster. Less reduction necessary!

Anyway, pics so far!
 

Attachments

Last edited:

dmar836

New Member
Jun 23, 2009
166
3
0
KC
Good job! I would have thought the wheels would have lasted but not against a 900lb hog.
Could you build a spacer to fill the area under your U-bolts - between your motor mount and frame tubes?
Dave
KC
 

tyrslider

New Member
Sep 26, 2008
958
2
0
RainCity
Thanks! I could make spacers (= time & $). But the front ubolt is not tight in the pic and the rears don't need a spacer. These motor platforms nestle right down into the frame and because they fit so well they don't require being over torqued to stay in place. And by mounting the bearing carriers to the platform the motor won't try to torque itself or the jackshaft out of position. On the right side the opening, is going to be covered by chainrings.

A swivel is another way to hug the frame a little more! .wee.
 

Attachments

Kevron99

New Member
Aug 11, 2009
261
0
0
Howell, New Jersey
I would call this more "BoardTrack Inspired" (maybe "MotorNewsBoy") as the owner prefers it to have a more upright riding position.

The frame is a Worksman recovered from a barn it shared w/ a 900 lb Hog. I suspect he was drawn to the bike w/ "itching post" eyes 'cause the wheels were folded over in addition to other, more superficial, "hog damage". In fact that's when I realised that Worksman wheels (at least mine) are not laced up properly (<<<, and not <<>). Hmm... kinda reads like "Airplane" under Over, over Under, vector Victor; you get the idea.

Forks from Raleigh upgraded w/ a Fox Vanilla damper 'n' spring w/ 1 1/8" headset and steerer. Spring might be stiff but we'll give it a try 1st. Lifan 98cc 2.5 HP FlatHead motor. Doin' a 6 speed shifter transmitted in front and Below the motor. Has a rear drum brake; haven't decided for the front but we have options. IRC Metro tires to keep the rubber side down! Wide crank spindle is going to be a must

Been takin' some lessons from this site and others; we're gonna do a simple in frame gas tank 'tween the top tubes.

The plumbers seat tube is a nice touch but it's gotta go!

I'll have it mocked up and running soon I hope. then a quick strip down and off to powdercoat matte on flat or flat on matte don't know haven't decided.

The motor mount is finished and I'm making bearing carriers for the jackshaft that'll mount up on the front underside of the motor mount for rigidity and alignment ease.

I don't have any need to bypass the governer other than it doesn't lend itself to throttle/cable control; I 'm not looking to make the motor spin faster. Less reduction necessary!

Anyway, pics so far!
Nice looking build you got there...Just a question what kind of motor you've got there? I am starting a board tracker built for myself and I am still gathering information. Thanks
 

silverbear

The Boy Who Never Grew Up
Jul 9, 2009
8,325
670
113
northeastern Minnesota
Boy, is that a snug fit!. I have a Worksman Newsboy ready for a motor come spring, so I'm very interested in what you're doing and will be looking over your shoulder as you go. Thanks for sharing.
SB
 

dmar836

New Member
Jun 23, 2009
166
3
0
KC
Off the front of the mount? I can't picture it. Will you have a freewheel countershaft on your cranks?
 

Clotho

Member
May 25, 2008
304
2
18
I have seen a few projects now with ducted fan motors without the ducts. What I haven't seen is anyone saying that they can be run under load in this fashion and that it works.

I wish you luck with your project and I hope you are successful but I would hate to see you put in many hours of work only to find that the motor overheats and fails.
 

mekano

Member
Nov 4, 2008
219
13
16
Stockholm, Sweden
I rode a bike with temporarily open fan 15 years ago. I still havent found the other half of my toe... The fan ate my shoe, sock and worked it´s way in to the bone.
 

tyrslider

New Member
Sep 26, 2008
958
2
0
RainCity
I'm not really planning on running it w/o the shroud; gonna run w/o the fin covers though. In Arizona during the summer I might be concerned about overheating. I live in Seattle ( I think we have < 100 days > 70 deg a yr). It's acually really easy to find out if there's gonna be a problem by running temp tests w/ and w/o the shrouding using a laser thermometer.

These motors are designed to be run stationary in the hot sun all day long; for that they need shrouding. For "most" of our purposes they are not running for long periods of time and very little at all w/o moving and most of us are lucky to see many hot days.

Thanks for the concerns and the heads up though. When I get both 4stroke bikes going I'll do temp tests on both and give results.

Dmar there will be a freewheel on the pedal crank a'la SBP.

Kevron it is a 98cc 2.5 hp "flathead" Lifan motor
 
Last edited:

42blue15

New Member
Sep 18, 2008
136
0
0
St Louis metro, USA
.... In fact that's when I realised that Worksman wheels (at least mine) are not laced up properly (<<<, and not <<>). Hmm... kinda reads like "Airplane" under Over, over Under, vector Victor; you get the idea. ....
I bought a Worksman new once, so I have seen the OEM wheels.

The spokes on mine were crossed properly, but not woven--if that is what you mean.
Regular bicycle spokes are almost always woven and crossed (-unless they are radial in which case they can't be woven, cause they don't cross).

I would bet the Worksman spoke method is intentional, as weaving such thick spokes would be difficult and generally not productive. ....And it has an advantage for motorbikers using rag-joint sprocket attachment, in that the rear spokes do not touch where they cross, so there is no problem of them rubbing together and wearing themselves thin and breaking at that point.
~
 

Clotho

Member
May 25, 2008
304
2
18
Ok, That sounds like it should have a decent chance of working. I would break the engine in on regular oil with all the shrouds on and then switch to synthetic as soon as the rings seated well. Synthetic has greater tolerance to heat and the superior lubrication should help keep the temp down a bit.
 

tyrslider

New Member
Sep 26, 2008
958
2
0
RainCity
42Blue, I respectfully disagree. It is not so much intentional as it is for a reason. That they are laced by a machine (In Taiwan, I suspect, where the rim and hub were manufactured). $ is the reason. Having laced many wheels myself w/ 11 to 15 guage spokes and given the length of 26" wheel spokes there is no difficulty in interlacing the final cross. Another thing you'll observe in machine built wheels is that the spokes go the same direction on both sides unlike hand built that are opposite. Motorcycle wheels are different in that they are all oriented essentially "elbow" in at the hub, where as, on cross pattern bicycle wheels, they are alternating (elbow in, elbow out) at the hub. Apparantly the machines fully tighten ea. spoke 1 at a time, all the way, rather than loosely assembling all and tightening evenly (especially damaging to aluminum rims). If you look at the whole thing closely w/ a critical eye you'll see that it is not right and that a wheel w smaller spokes laced the same way is inferior. Interlacing the final cross in a 3 cross pattern bicycle wheel is important, for many reasons, not the least of which is longevity.

That being said, the Worksman wheels are over built for their designed purpose "going slow w/ heavy loads" and going fast won't be a detriment. They are far and away better than the Mall Wart crap and they look really cool on a motorbike! dance1

Clotho, I'm w/ you on the break in good lookin out! Also you aroused me into action! The shroud/no shroud division. At my day job I work in the thermal test equipment industry. I'm no Thermal Dynamics Engineer but I spoke w/ one of our engineers today and he gave me some ideas for simple tests that should give some real data concerning shrouds vs. not. We have access to some pretty cool test equipment. For example, I can test windspeed in the shroud and get an average by measuring in several spots. In the coming week or so we'll be using windspeed sensors and I'll be able to do some testing. In addition I'll test them in application, under load. I'll at least be able to conclude it for myself.

Bottom bracket, tires etc on the way. Finishing bearing carriers and more assembly this wknd!
Stay Tuned!
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Clotho

Member
May 25, 2008
304
2
18
Excellent!

That kind of data will be really helpful for others. The cooling system on both the 2 strokes and the 4 strokes are critical components to the motor. You can't radically compromise this and not expect to have some problems. I know that on the 2 stroke China motors the cooling fins are just barely adequate in many cases and they provide much more surface area than the 4 strokes with the shrouds off. If you want an idea of what the cooling fins should really look like take a look a one of the Morinni motors.

It is possible to increase the surface area of the fins by welding and grinding them. I have seen it done on motorcycles. There are also other things that can be done like using synthetic oil.
 

tyrslider

New Member
Sep 26, 2008
958
2
0
RainCity
Fins need to be larger on 2 strokes cause they generate more heat so the Morini motor is a good example for 2 strokes but not 4. You may have a point though in that they could have reduced fin size in lieu of the blower.

Got my JS bearings mounted and lightened the motor reduction gear!
 

Attachments

Last edited:

tyrslider

New Member
Sep 26, 2008
958
2
0
RainCity
Been workin on the tank here 'n there; made a SS bung and plain steel spout today. Think I'll take a little more length off the bung. I think it's looking nice though.

I'll be welding the tank up this wknd. I'm learnin' a lot w/ this one!
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Dan

Staff
May 25, 2008
12,765
115
48
59
Moosylvania
TS, was trying to remember what thread the "hog" was on. Cracks me up

That Tank is awesome. Whole build is.

If it were going on a more vintage appearing bike, could you imagine a site glass with a goose neck at the top working as the vent? All brass and glass. (Well tubing) I got a thing for polished brass.

Again, great build.
 

mekano

Member
Nov 4, 2008
219
13
16
Stockholm, Sweden
nice work! When Im grown I will make a tank that follows the bend of the upper frame. But that is far away, I dont have any skills, equipment for bending or a welder. Just dreaming. I would love to have your tank.