shortest cranks that are still somewhat functional

GoldenMotor.com

the chief

New Member
Dec 9, 2012
24
0
0
chicago
whats the shortest cranks people have found to still be mildly functional? basically just long enough to be able to startup, not pedal as a functional nonmotorized bicycle. i tried a 3inch crank but it was way to short to get enough leverage especially with a 24 tooth front sprocket.
 

biknut

Well-Known Member
Sep 28, 2010
6,631
409
83
Dallas
After I lowered the Atomic BB I had to shorten the cranks from 168mm to 115mm. Then to make it easier to pedal I changed the gearing from 18/55, to 22/34. It's still a little hard to pedal, but recently on black friday I pedaled it 10 miles with a group of bicyclers on mostly level grade, and averaged about 9 mph. I'm 59 so I think I have a right to brag about it a little lol.




 
Last edited:

headtrama

Member
Jul 8, 2010
886
2
16
california
Yeah he did , he said he needed to use them on start up, You also need them to get you going a little . If not his next post would be why did my clutch stop working lol.
 

scotto-

Custom 4-Stroke Bike Builder
Jun 3, 2010
6,505
24
38
Ridin' inSane Diego, CA.
I just take the cranks off my kids old 16" bicycles......they're plenty short and you can run the tiny pedals that come on them too ;) Or put larger pedals on if you prefer.

dnut