Originally Posted by Norman
That bike gets my vote it is cool I'd like to hear it run.
Notice it to is a single speed no tranny.
Yeah, I did notice that. Either there wasnt enough space for a gearbox or the engine had enough torque without needing one. I would bet on a mixture of the two because it would be a slow running long stroke engine back then...
I would also wonder how it would handle because of the gyroscopic nature of the running engine - im just not sure whether it would make it less or more stable than a normal bike
"....Look, no pedals... *thud*..." The mating call of the motorized-biker.
"RetroEagle" - 32cc Two-Stroke, Piped. 35mph on #13 gear. Reversed stem with springer fork.