Quote:
Originally Posted by Bikeguy Joe "happy times" which are more accurately called CIF (Chinese in-frame) bicycle motors are not unreliable once set up properly.
1000 miles to a belt and that's better than a chain how?!?
For 600++ dollars I'll build three CIF's and keep the change thank you. |
and thats the charm isnt it - set up properly. I dont have a engineering shop in my kitchen - I dont want to have to rebuild an engine to get it to run and I certainly dont need to have to worry about it failing on me when I need it. The CIF engines are low compression, low efficiency and even you will admit not great on quality.
I dont know how long the belts will last - but its a given that if you choose belt over chain you will have to replace it more often - but you wont get a belt smashing the living crap out of the wheel if it slips off - why do you think the original geared motorbikes used belt? and why alot of the machines made now are going back to them? chains are longer lasting, but they are noisier and personally I would rather have a belt snap while riding than a chain, and yes, they do snap.
Two strokes are inherantly more powerful than 4-strokes. Thats a fact.
Two strokes have fewer moving parts than a 4-stroke. That is also a fact.
Two strokes are inherantly more tunable than a 4-stroke. another fact
The only drawback of two strokes is the total loss lubrication system which means you have to mix petroil. I dont see that as even close to a problem since I get a reliable simple and powerful machine with a 32cc engine when everyone else is fighting flappy chains, sprocket problems and engines that detonate more often than a NSU Ro80, and did I mention they are up to 50% bigger for the same road speed...
Commercial engines are more expensive - all three of the commercial kits - staton, DAX and GEBE - have developed their mounts to the same quality. Quality has and always will cost money.
Sean, fitting up the GEBE kit is fairly simple. The most important requirements are to fit up the sheave on the wheel accurately and also make sure the belt tracks true as close to the centre of the drive gear as possible. This can be helped with spacers and such.
With the 40cc engine it does tend to push the belt a little hard - the best way to look after it is to not snap the throttle open or pull away without pedalling.
I have fitted up the GEBE on both a cruiser bike and a MTB - my preference would be a cruiser bike with front suspension decent brakes and deraillier gears (hubs can be a pain if you arent used to them). The model I have is a Schwinn Deluxe 7. A drum brake fitted to the front hub will give you good weatherproof brakes.
The argument between which is more reliable is purely subjective. If you compared a CIF engine to a similar quality 4-stroke then you would have a fair comparison. A fair comparison between engines would indeed be the DAX 50cc Titan versus the GEBE 32/40 - properly treated they would last about the same time, you need to mix fuel for the 2 strokes - but then you need to adjust valves and such on the Titan and the power per swept cc is lower.
The two advantages of a CIF engine is the frame mount position and the availability of the shifter kit. Its my own personal opinion, that for the requirements I have (I use my bike as my only form of transport) even given those advantages the potential problems of the CIF engine are too many.
Jemma xx